Why the 9/11 Mosque Controversy Is NOT About Religious Freedom

Posted by on Jul 31st, 2010 and filed under Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

(Wayne Allyn Root) – As one of America’s leading Libertarian thinkers, perhaps I’m always expected to give the “Libertarian answer” to every issue. But sometimes one has to speak not as a Libertarian, Republican or Democrat, but rather as an American – preferably a common sense American.

The issue of allowing a mosque to be built in the shadow of the 9/11 terrorist tragedy is one of those times.

The answer is simple for a common sense American – I support religious freedom, as all Americans should. But this is not a case of religious freedom. The definition of religious freedom is that Muslims can build their mosque virtually anywhere in America- despite 9/11…despite the Times Square bomber…despite plots by Islamic extremists to blow up the New York subway system…despite everything happening in Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan. That’s what makes our country great. We do in fact support religious freedom. You can build a mosque virtually anywhere in America.

However, there is also freedom of the rights and sensibilities of others to consider in a free society.

This specific issue of building a mosque at 9/11 Ground Zero is unique. It is not about religious freedom. Rather it is a blatant offense to all Americans, and a desecration of America that should not and cannot be allowed to stand.

Does “religious freedom” mean hate groups should build statues to Hitler in front of Jewish temples in America? Should Americans raise money to build Jewish temples and Christian churches at Mecca? Should Japan build a statue to the bravery of their pilots at Pearl Harbor? Should the U.S. build a statue to the bravery of our pilots at the site of Hiroshima? Why not? Aren’t those examples all about “freedom of expression,” “religious freedom” and property rights? Yet common sense obviously overrules even “freedom of religion” in these cases.

This proposed building of a mosque on hallowed ground is an ATROCITY towards America. To build a celebration of Islam within steps of 9/11 does nothing to increase religious freedom…it inspires hatred, divides our cultures, and increases the odds of violence and hate crimes. Common sense dictates this mosque, being built in this specific location, is NOT being built as a sign of friendship between Muslims and Americans…but rather as a sign of the lack of respect…a belief in our weakness…and an attempt to embarrass and belittle us. The financial district of Manhattan is not a residential area with a large number of Muslim residents for the mosque to serve. Therefore common sense dictates that the only possible reason to build it there (rather than in Brooklyn or Queens where there are large Muslim populations) is to show Muslim contempt for Americans by building a monument to Islam in the shadow of the site of their greatest triumph over America.

It is an offense to build a mosque in that location – an offense to all Americans (including Muslim Americans), all Christians and Jews, all relatives of 3,000 dead heroes at the World Trade Center. It is not an example of religious freedom- it is an example of people shoving their religion down our throat to taunt us. It is a DIRECT assault on our culture. It is using our own Constitution to make a mockery of America. It is an attempt by foreigners to make Americans look like weak fools, tolerant of even our enemies mocking our dead in the center of our own country.

Yes, private individuals and organizations have the right to build houses of worship with their own funds. But one has to wonder where the money is coming from to build a 15-story building on some of the most expensive real estate in the country? We believe in the separation of Church and State in this country. Therefore an immediate investigation as to the source of the money for this project is well within our legal rights. If it turns out that this project is sponsored by a foreign government or organizations that support or fund terrorism, I believe it would be consistent with our Constitution to prohibit this mosque from being built.

However, if this is privately funded by parties with no ties to terrorism, I have to believe that we have enough people in this country who are offended by the prospect of a mosque at Ground Zero, that the money can be raised to buy this land at a fair price from the owners. I know I’d be the first to contribute to keep this sacred land from ever being desecrated by a symbol of the very groups that attacked America on 9/11.

We can also put public pressure on the property owners to sell to this new patriotic foundation funded by Americans. We can organize massive protests, filling the streets surrounding this property with patriotic Americans concerned that the hallowed ground of 9/11 never be used as a political tool to taunt or embarrass the United States, or as a place to preach intolerance towards Americans. I, for one, am ready to fly 3,000 miles to New York to join the protest.

These are the only rational answers for common sense patriotic Americans. In situations like this, none of us can afford to be Libertarians, Republicans, Democrats, or politicians of any stripe. We are all proud Americans.

(Wayne Allyn Root was the 2008 Libertarian Vice Presidential candidate and author of “The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gambling & Tax Cuts.”)

6 Responses for “Why the 9/11 Mosque Controversy Is NOT About Religious Freedom”

  1. Gerald Sills says:

    The people who, claim to represent us, are the ones who are provoking American citizens to anger. This Mosque represents an oppressive religion, and one behind the attacks on a nation of Free people. I blame most of them on the ignorant Democrats who, year after year, send their trashy candidates back to Washington, and State offices to do their damnedest to incite the anger of the citizens. Real change lies within the few remaining brain cells of Democrats, and if they don’t change very soon, they will create a world they hate more than anything else in life. That will be the time they learn to use a mirror for real purposes.

  2. lyn patrick says:

    Wayne,
    Thank you for this well thought out article on what has become such a complex issue. It should not be complex. Common sense and the feelings of the majority should always rule in a situation like this. On a lighter side, I have to think that if the mosque is not built, some Jewish realtor will be out of a huge
    commission.

  3. Durk Pearson says:

    Fine thinking. I’d be delighted to contribute to a fund to outbid the mosque building group. How about using it for a heavily reinforced and defended museum dedicated to exposing the horrors of Islamofascism?

  4. Scott Chappell says:

    As far as I’m concerned, the issue is being blown out of proportion. Every religion has extremists. All Muslims are not of the same mentality as the wackos who took part in the 9/11 attacks.

    As long as the proper permits are obtained and the proposed building meets with the New York City Planning Commision, the Muslims, or anyone else for that matter, can build any structure they wish.

    Our society is becomming too obsessed with hurting people’s feelings. I say “take it like a man” and shut up!! There are much more serious issues to deal with than where towel-heads choose to worship!

  5. Paul Kelly says:

    And yes, this IS to be built as a slap in the face to Americans. Look at what it is to be named…Cordoba House. After Cordoba, Spain where the Moors headquartered when they took over Spain

  6. P. Gladd says:

    I would contribute to a fund to support this historic building from being destroyed. This controversy is so much more than religious freedom. It is about claiming land area for implanting muslim objectives towards gaining religious domination.

Leave a Reply

Security Code: