(Nancy Dallas) – I am a lifelong Republican and devout believer in the basic Republican tenets. Some Republican candidates fit my definition of those tenets better than others; however, not all of those candidates came out winners in their Primary contest. Regardless, I WILL vote the straight Republican ticket when I go to the ballot box in November.
I admire people who ‘walk their talk’ by openly standing up for and actively promoting and supporting the principles in which they truly believe, even when it may alienate a good many of their compatriots.
I admire all those willing to put their name on a ballot and sticking to their principle beliefs as they vie for an office.
I admire those who openly and actively dedicate themselves to supporting the candidate(s) of their choice.
The Primaries are now over. It is what often happens when the Republican candidate of a supporter’s personal choice does not survive the Primary Election that disappoints and angers me. I have no admiration for a Republican who claims they believe in the basic doctrines of the Republican Party and then vows, on principle, to not vote for the Republican candidate in the General Election.
If this country is going to ever return to its Republican based principles and Constitutional roots, Republican idealism must end with the counting of the Primary votes. There comes a point in time when one must seriously consider the alternatives and consequences of NOT voting for Republican candidates in the General Election.
That time is now. The lessons of the past two elections – and corresponding and continuing abuse and demise of the basic foundations upon which this country was created – should be lesson enough. (Nevada – highest unemployment rate in the nation; skyrocketing national debt; alarming loss of individual rights, and on and on…)
In politics, numbers is the name of the game. Without the numbers, you sit and watch. If the Republicans do not regain the necessary numbers in the coming elections, this once ‘Grand Old Party’ will remain relegated to the political bench.
I am not writing this to preach one view over another as to who is right or wrong in regards to their ‘conservative’ or ‘moderate’ Republican positions. I am not going to argue the pro’s and con’s of a candidate signing or not signing a ‘no new taxes’ pledge. Nor am I either advocating or demeaning any element of the ‘tea party’ movement. These issues have been debated to death during the recent Primary season. The voters have now spoken.
It is time for Republicans to acknowledge the wishes of the majority. The must unite and actively, promote, support and vote for each of those Republicans elected to participate in the General Election.
If you truly believe in the basic Republican principles, consider this………would you rather be dealing with a few Republican ‘rascals’ or continue down the current path of being relegated to dealing with the results of veto proof Democrat majorities – all for the sake of idealism.
The potential consequences are simply too damaging to waste a single Republican vote this November.
Think about it.
(Nancy Dallas lives in Virginia City and is the editor/publisher of Newsdeskbynancydallas.com)






Why voting straight party line is disaster and why I will only vote for those who will uphold the Constitution regardless of party affiliation.
http://www.independentamerican.org/2010/08/03/our-own-government-has-become-our-enemy/
Here Here. Straight party line is NOT a disaster when the alternative is further from the truth and the constitution. The simple truth is that for most seats in government, the choice is between a Republican and a Democrat. No third party or independent candidate has a legitimate shot at winning.
If you can find even ONE Democrat that will stick to the constitution better than his/her Republican opponent I will gladly vote for them too. But a constitutional Democrat is an oxymoron these days.
The decision is made for you that Third Parties are non-consequential and cannot win. This obviously ignores history. Since 1880 there have been 31 Senators, 111 Congressman and 22 Governors who were neither Republicans nor Democrats. Abraham Lincoln himself was a third party candidate in 1860, winning in a race that featured 4 different candidates receiving Presidential electoral votes.
Debates around the country today have devolved to managed events that assume that you are too dumb to make honest evaluations, and that someone other than YOU needs to “cut the list down” for your benefit. What an offense to your intelligence and to your freedom of electoral choice.
Keep voting straight party line for Republicans such as Lynn Stewart, Bill Raggio and Pete Goicoechea . A few shining examples of what you get voting straight party line instead of principle.
The only wasted vote is a vote for a Republican or a Democrat. Freedom and independence today begins with freedom and independence from the tyranny of the two-party state, from the Republican and Democratic parties, from the decadence and degeneracy they represent.
There are many great IAP candidates running for election against RINOs in Clark county, For example, Mark Andrews (http://markandrews.info/) is running against the neoCON, Richard McArthur, in AD04. McArthur is a disaster for conservatives in Nevada. He votes for Real ID, and other liberty-hating positions, believing that safety is more important than liberty. If the Republican Party has shoved some neoCON or RINO on the ballot, then conservatives need to vote AGAINST this insanity. In 2008, when I ran as the IAP for AD04, it was the first time in many cycles where the Republican in AD04 did NOT get a majority of the vote, making AD04 no longer “safe” for the republican candidate. The IAP is not a threat to conservatives, the IAP is a threat to neoCONs and RINOs.