{"id":35676,"date":"2016-12-20T01:24:09","date_gmt":"2016-12-20T08:24:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/?p=35676"},"modified":"2016-12-20T01:24:09","modified_gmt":"2016-12-20T08:24:09","slug":"i-was-in-charge-of-the-yucca-mountain-project-until-obama-shut-us-down-lets-bring-it-back","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/i-was-in-charge-of-the-yucca-mountain-project-until-obama-shut-us-down-lets-bring-it-back\/","title":{"rendered":"I Was In Charge Of The Yucca Mountain Project – Until Obama Shut Us Down. Let’s Bring It Back."},"content":{"rendered":"

(Courtesy: Getty)<\/p><\/div>\n

(Christopher Kouts)<\/strong><\/em> –\u00a0As one of the former\u00a0directors of the Department of Energy\u2019s program charged with disposing of spent nuclear fuel and Defense high-level radioactive waste, we had high hopes for the Yucca Mountain project.<\/p>\n

And then the Obama Administration, for political reasons, suddenly shut us down.<\/p>\n

Over 85,000 metric tons of civilian spent nuclear fuel and Defense high-level radioactive waste are currently stranded in 35 States around this nation. That\u2019s enough nuclear waste to cover a football field 15 yards deep.<\/p>\n

Unshielded, these materials would provide a lethal radiation dose to a nearby person in minutes. All of this waste currently sits in cooling pools or in storage facilities at over 70 sites. With the ending of the Obama Administration, the nation has an opportunity to finally address its longstanding commitment to dispose of these materials.<\/p>\n

Prior to President Obama, the nation had followed through on a well-constructed plan to find a long-term geologic repository for all of our nuclear waste, as directed in the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.<\/p>\n

In 1987, for primarily fiscal reasons, the original Act was amended to focus scientific studies on the highest rated and safest geologic repository site \u2013 Yucca Mountain, Nevada.<\/p>\n

The vote in the U.S. Senate at that time to select the Yucca Mountain site for further study was 98-2.\u00a0 The U.S. House vote was also overwhelming.<\/p>\n

The Yucca Mountain site was exhaustively studied for over 20 years, during which time over eight billion dollars was expended on its evaluation. The Department of Energy submitted the Yucca Mountain license application to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in June 2008.<\/p>\n

That application was under review by the NRC when the Obama Administration took office in January 2009 and a decision on the safety of the site, by law, would have been rendered in 2012 \u2013 over four years ago.<\/p>\n

However, during the 2008 Presidential campaign, a backroom political deal was reached between then Senator Barack Obama and Senator Harry Reid. Simply put, if Reid moved up the Democratic Party Nevada Caucuses several weeks to allow Obama an early primary victory then, if Obama were elected, he would stop the Yucca Mountain Project.<\/p>\n

The Obama\/Reid political arrangement has been discussed publicly in various Congressional Hearings and is a matter of public record.<\/p>\n

After President Obama\u2019s election, the program was subsequently starved of funds and the remaining 850 Federal employees and contractor staff were either fired or dispositioned elsewhere. The records for the program were mothballed and sent to a Federal records graveyard in West Virginia with their retrievability questionable.<\/p>\n

The sheer hubris of the Executive Branch unilaterally terminating a program that had been legally progressing to a conclusion was virtually unnoticed in the press due to the 2008-9 financial crisis.<\/p>\n

To attempt to fill the void it had just created, the Obama Administration directed the Secretary of Energy to establish a \u201cBlue Ribbon Commission\u201d to look at other options for high\u2013level waste disposal.\u00a0 After two years of monotonous droning of public hearings and meetings, the Commission came up with the pre-programmed conclusion that the current path (disposal at Yucca Mountain) was not workable.<\/p>\n

That Commission then recommended that the nation should effectively start over looking for geologic repository sites – setting back progress in this area nearly 30 years.<\/p>\n

With the completion of that report in 2012, exactly no progress has been made on alternatives. In addition, no serious attempt has been made at new legislation on this issue or the pursuit of another policy path, since the Obama Administration\u2019s political objective of satisfying Senator Reid had been accommodated.<\/p>\n

That accommodation, however, was done at the expense of the rest of the\u00a0United States.<\/p>\n

As I testified before Congress, the Obama Administration\u2019s decision to shut down the Yucca Mountain Project is troubling because Yucca Mountain has not failed any technical or regulatory test. The thousands of our brightest scientists and engineers that worked on this massive undertaking believe, as I believe, that the site would meet the stringent regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency and the NRC and assure the long-term safety of the public from these materials, thereby protecting future generations and the environment.<\/p>\n

Given the substantial investment we’ve made in the Yucca Mountain site and in the policy that has been supported by every prior Administration since 1982, the nation deserves a final and definitive answer on the Yucca Mountain site from the NRC licensing process \u2013 an answer that the American public was robbed of under the Obama Administration.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Column also appears<\/a> at Independent Journal Review (IJR).<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Christopher Kouts) –\u00a0As one of the former\u00a0directors of the Department of Energy\u2019s program charged with disposing of spent nuclear fuel and Defense high-level radioactive waste, we had high hopes for the Yucca Mountain project. And then the Obama Administration, for political reasons, suddenly shut us down. Over 85,000 metric tons of civilian spent nuclear fuel […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":35677,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35676"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35676"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35676\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35678,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35676\/revisions\/35678"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nevadanewsandviews.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}