Nevada’s Water Policy Whiplash: From Paying to Remove Grass to Paying to Plant Trees

Posted By

The Latest Government Mission Creep

Here we go again with government agencies expanding their reach beyond their original mission. The Southern Nevada Water Authority just announced they’ll pay homeowners $100 for each tree they plant. This is the same agency that has spent 25 years and $345 million paying people to rip out their landscaping to save water.

But wait – this tree program isn’t even about water conservation. It’s about fighting “urban heat islands” and climate change. The water agency has now decided it’s also in the business of temperature control and social justice.

Let me get this straight. The water authority’s job is supposed to be managing water. But now they’re urban planners, climate activists, and heat equity warriors too. They’re using ratepayer money to pursue multiple agendas at once.

A Quarter Century of Changing Their Minds

Since 1999, the Water Smart Landscapes program has converted 241 million square feet of lawns and issued about $345 million in rebates. That’s enough grass to wrap around the Earth’s equator. All because government experts said removing grass would save water.

The flip-flopping didn’t stop there. In 2018, they raised rebates from $2 to $3 per square foot because not enough people were ripping out their grass. Then in 2024, some areas got $5 per square foot. Henderson even threw in an extra $575 bonus.

But wait, there’s more. In 2021, Governor Steve Sisolak signed Assembly Bill 356, requiring businesses to remove “nonfunctional grass” by the end of 2026. No more voluntary programs. This was a mandate.

“Nonfunctional grass” means grass that isn’t used for sports, picnics, or recreation. Basically, if the only person walking on your grass is pushing a lawn mower, it had to go.

The New Tree Push – And Its Real Purpose

Now the same water authority is pushing trees, but not for water reasons. The tree program started in July 2023 to fight what they call “urban heat islands.” Las Vegas has the most intense urban heat island effect in America. Poor neighborhoods get hotter than rich ones.

Bronson Mack from the Southern Nevada Water Authority said:

“We have already seen more than 6,500 new trees added to this valley from property owners while they are replacing their grass. That is adding millions of square feet of additional tree canopy,”

But here’s the catch: you have to remove grass first to get the tree money. The programs run together. Remove grass, plant trees, get paid twice. The tree program pays $100 per tree, but only for trees that provide at least 236 square feet of shade when fully grown.

The water authority got $10 million to plant 100,000 trees. They’re also working with nonprofits to plant trees in “underserved” neighborhoods as part of “tree equity.” Yes, that’s a real term they use.

Why This Matters to Conservatives

This isn’t just about landscaping. It’s about mission creep and government agencies that expand their power beyond their original purpose. A water authority should manage water. Instead, they’re social engineering neighborhoods based on climate ideology and racial equity theories.

The Water Smart Landscapes rebate program has saved the community 203 billion gallons of water since 1999. That’s their job. But now they’re also urban heat specialists, climate change fighters, and social justice warriors.

These bureaucrats are spending taxpayer and ratepayer money on programs that go far beyond water management. They’re using “tree equity” language and targeting specific neighborhoods based on income and race. That’s not water policy – that’s social policy.

The water authority admits Las Vegas will lose 16% of its common tree species by 2025 due to heat. So they’re planting trees that will die while collecting federal climate money to do it. Your water bills help pay for this.

Looking Ahead

The mandatory grass removal for businesses kicks in January 2027. The law applies to commercial, multi-family, government and other properties but not to single-family residences.

Business owners facing mandatory grass removal by 2026 point out the double standard. They must remove grass by law while homeowners get paid to voluntarily remove theirs.

Meanwhile, the tree planting program continues with federal climate money. The water authority plans to plant 100,000 trees by working with nonprofits focused on “environmental justice.”

Don’t be surprised if they find new missions in the coming years. Water agencies in California now manage homelessness programs. It’s the same pattern everywhere: start with one job, then expand into every trendy cause.

The water authority already has partnerships with social justice organizations and takes federal climate grants. They’re more interested in being environmental heroes than just keeping the water flowing.

What Conservatives Can Do

First, demand that agencies stick to their core mission. Water authorities should manage water, not pursue climate activism and social engineering. Ask your representatives why ratepayers fund programs that have nothing to do with water supply.

Second, question why federal climate money flows to local water agencies. The Inflation Reduction Act sent billions to agencies for programs outside their expertise. This is how mission creep spreads.

Third, watch for “equity” language in government programs. When agencies start talking about “tree equity” and “environmental justice,” they’re no longer focused on basic services. They’re pursuing political agendas.

Finally, push for transparency in rate setting. Your water bills shouldn’t fund climate programs, social justice initiatives, or urban planning experiments. Water rates should pay for water infrastructure and services.

The Nevada situation shows how agencies expand their power using trendy causes and federal money. Today it’s trees and heat islands. Tomorrow it could be anything that sounds good and attracts grant funding.

Let agencies do their jobs. Stop the mission creep. And maybe, just maybe, focus on keeping water affordable and reliable instead of saving the planet one tree at a time.

This article was written with the assistance of AI. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.