The Fauci Cover-Up Goes Deeper than You Know
(Lori Piotrowski) – When Dr. Anthony Fauci sat before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee last week, did anyone really expect answers to our questions about the multi-year man-made pandemic? Even though the doctor with Napoleonic dreams told CNN that he would be “happy to testify before any congressional oversight committee” in 2022? Didn’t think so.
A couple of days ago, maybe a few of you witnessed the verbal donnybrook between Secretary Kennedy and CNN’s Dana Bash about media coverage during the pandemic. Then he landed the roundhouse punch: “Your job — your job — is a fierce skepticism toward authority, and you weren’t doing that.”
And this is where we can’t despise the media enough. Remember when we used to have beat reporters? There was a fellow who did sports, naturally, and a gal who did the fashion pages, but we also had someone on the police desk, and to my point, someone who followed science.
On that same episode of CNN’s “State of the Union,” Dana Bash insisted that “the COVID vaccine prevented deaths. There is data, upon data, upon data.” But she didn’t present any data to back up that claim.
For all the “science” reporters who neglected their duty during the COVID-19 years, here are a few things you could have, should have, read about, had they been worth a few grains of salt.
Let’s talk about some of that data, starting with two medicines that Fauci demonized on behalf of Big Pharma, and the media dutifully reported: hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both are FDA-approved and have been prescribed by doctors for many years.
Two highly respected medical journals, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine, published studies concluding that hydroxychloroquine was not only ineffective but dangerous. These studies were based on data from a company called Surgisphere, whose database was later discovered to be NONEXISTENT. Eventually, both journals retracted the articles.
This scandal came to light in September 2020.
Ivermectin, which earned its founders a Nobel prize in 2015, was originally designed to combat river blindness in humans. Suddenly, people in the US were being ridiculed for taking horse pills while people in India treated with it were being cured.
Studies conducted in 2020 showed positive results in Argentinian healthcare workers who took Ivermectin weekly. And in March, China was publishing studies showing positive results in patients being treated with hydroxychloroquine.
Yet Fauci and Big Pharma rejected both medicines, and the media pushed that information down our throats like the bitter pill we knew it to be.
Big Pharma makes money from its products—everybody knows that. What we may not know (because our science reporters were sleeping) is that Fauci and others were already colluding to speed up the FDA’s regulatory process.
Keep in mind that Fauci “predicted” on January 12, 2017, before Trump’s first inauguration, that a “surprise outbreak” was on the horizon. Two years later, shortly before the virus gained traction publicly, he made similar comments at the Milken Future Health Summit.
At that summit, Fauci and several others also discussed the need to improve how vaccines are developed. Fauci said, “It is going to be difficult to change that unless you do it from within and, say, I don’t care what your perception is, we are going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an integrative way because you need both.”
Another participant stated that “there might be an urgent call. . . not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes . . . it is not too crazy to think an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere…” (You can view the video Making Influenza History: The Quest for a Universal Vaccine online.)
How important was it for Fauci to insist on a new protocol and that we be jabbed?
Well, other than his diary entries that demonstrated his desire for continued fame…
Pfizer made $63.2 billion from its vaccine in 2021-2022.
But first, the vaccine needed to be made, and therefore, the company needed time to do so. Fauci allowed them that time by insisting on the lockdowns (in this author’s opinion). If he controlled the population, he gave Pfizer and Moderna (a company with no experience in this type of vaccine research) to get their wares to market.
Again, if we had a capable science reporter or two, we might have learned that, during Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trials, the company took multiple shortcuts that likely produced favorable results. In what was originally designed as a three-year trial, we saw:
- Adverse reactions to the vaccine were not considered after fourteen weeks, even though data had been collected through six months.
- Not everyone in the vaccine group or the control group was tested for COVID-19, only suspected cases.
- The two-month trial earned Pfizer authorization for emergency use authorization (EUA), but the vaccine was still not FDA approved. The company then opened (unblinded) the study, leaving it without a control group to monitor the vaccine’s effects and without safety data.
- The vaccine’s test population was healthier overall than the general population, leading to skewed results.
- The trial was called off after six months.
The “quick process” had been achieved, although the long-term results had not.
By 2021, studies from Qatar and Israel showed that Pfizer knew that protection from the vaccine was beginning to wane after the second booster.
But there was a silver lining: if you know that your “clients” will need forever boosters, you have a perennial income stream.
We’re in August, the fall/winter flu season is around the corner, and already the COVID-19 booster ads are beginning to pop up on television and radio. Have you had yours yet?
Although we don’t know what Senator Rand Paul’s next step will be for Dr. Fauci, it behooves all of us to approach the legacy media with caution. They may not have our best interests at heart.
Hat tip: Bamboozled, Duped, and Hoodwinked: Keys to Escaping the Tricks, Deceptions, and Half-Truths of the Medical Industry by Dr. Joe Jacko. (Powell, OH: Ethos, 2025).
Lori Piotrowski is the author of Revolutionary Spark, the third in the Molly Weston Chronicles. She worked closely with Dr. Jacko on Bamboozled, Duped, and Hoodwinked.
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology may have been used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
