Kasama’s Response to Ethics Complaint May Have Made Things Worse

Posted By


 

Assemblywoman Heidi Kasama has spent the past year promoting herself as a champion of transparency in government.

But her response to two financial disclosure complaints may have raised more questions than they answered.

The complaints, filed with the Nevada Secretary of State, allege Kasama failed to disclose her household’s connection to two Nevada companies: Falcon’s Nest Townhouses, LLC and Bellevue Hill Village, LLC.

Both filings cite Nevada law NRS 281.571, which requires candidates to list business entities involving themselves or members of their household.

Corporate filings show Kasama’s husband, Peter Kasama, listed as a manager of the companies.

The complaints also point out that Heidi Kasama herself signed the corporate documents connected to the companies as “manager.”

That connection is why critics say the entities should have appeared on Kasama’s 2026 financial disclosure statement.

Kasama’s campaign responded in a press release this week, calling the issue “routine paperwork” and a “desperate attack” by her Clark County Commission opponent, Albert Mack.

According to the campaign, the companies were handled by Kasama’s husband as part of his work as a CPA. When he became ill and could not complete the filings, the campaign says Kasama stepped in to submit the paperwork for him.

The statement also claims neither Heidi nor Peter Kasama has any financial stake in the companies and that other accountants who have served in public office have not listed similar work on their disclosures.

Finally, the campaign said it is “proactively seeking guidance” from the Secretary of State’s office to ensure compliance.

But that explanation is drawing criticism of its own.

For one thing, critics note that the press release itself confirms Kasama signed the LLC paperwork. That fact alone raises a basic question:

If a public official signs corporate documents as a manager of a business entity, even temporarily, should that entity appear on a financial disclosure form meant to show voters potential conflicts of interest?

That is precisely why Nevada’s disclosure law exists.

The second question involves the campaign’s argument that other accountants have not listed similar work on disclosure forms.

Even if true, critics say that argument misses the point.

Transparency laws are not meant to be optional depending on what others do. They exist so voters can see the full picture of a candidate’s business connections.

A third issue comes from the campaign’s own wording.

The release states Kasama is “proactively seeking guidance” from the Secretary of State.

But critics argue that raises an obvious question: If the disclosure rules were clear and everything had been done correctly, why seek guidance only after the issue surfaced?

In politics, timing matters.

And this controversy arrives as Kasama continues to campaign on a platform centered around government transparency.

Last year she promoted a series of reforms aimed at making the Nevada Legislature more open, including forcing lawmakers to post bills online before voting and applying open meeting rules to legislative activity.

But those ideas were not exactly new.

Former Republican lawmakers such as Assemblyman Ed Goedhart and Assemblywoman Annie Black pushed similar transparency measures years earlier.

That contrast is now becoming part of the political debate surrounding the complaints.

Kasama’s critics say a candidate running on transparency should hold herself to the same standard she expects from government.

To be fair, the Secretary of State has not issued any ruling on the complaints, and a filing alone does not prove wrongdoing.

But the political damage often comes from the explanation.

Because when a transparency candidate says missing disclosures were simply routine paperwork, many voters may start asking the same question.

If transparency matters, why wasn’t everything disclosed in the first place?

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.