• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Letter: A WARNing Shot

Letter: A WARNing Shot
Chuck Muth
October 2, 2012

NN&V Exclusive

(Robert R. Kessler) – Let’s see if I have this straight. Under the Federal Government’s Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (WARN Act), employers with 100 or more employees are required to give 60 calendar day advance notification of mass layoffs. With sequestration of Federal funds looming, that means large defense contractors are facing exactly that possibility. But the Obama Administration’s Labor Department has said such advance notices would be “inappropriate.” Obviously because the required notices will be issued just a few days before the November election. So much for employee protection.

Because some contractors are balking, Obama’s Office of Management and Budget has now issued guidance that says that contractors who follow Labor’s suggestion to disobey the law will be protected against employee compensation costs. But contractors who DO obey the law will NOT be protected. Read that again, carefully.

Obama’s overt coercion puts contractors in a bind. Obviously there is the legal and ethical question of whether or not to follow the law. But there’s also the practical question of a company’s business future and bottom line. Any company that ignores the Obama diktat has to be prepared for retribution if Obama wins re-election. Their bottom line – and their shareholders – will be penalized.

Doesn’t this sound a lot like totalitarianism?

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
October 2, 2012
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Caldara: The GOP’s Master Plan to Keep Losing

NN&V StaffFebruary 3, 2024
Read More

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2024 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Political Signs, Governor Sandoval, And Educational Change
Harry Defends Administration’s Indefensible Political Ploy on Libyan Attacks