• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Obama’s Last SOTU: A Gentleman’s C

Obama’s Last SOTU: A Gentleman’s C
Chuck Muth
January 16, 2016

[the_ad id=”25740″]

Obama's final SOTU wasn't bad; it was just mediocre.

Obama’s final SOTU wasn’t bad; it was just mediocre.

 

Rich Galen

Rich Galen

(Rich Galen, Mullings.com) – State of the Union Addresses belong solely to Presidents of the United States.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution reads:

He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.

There is no requirement that it be an annual report. Nor, is there a requirement that it be delivered in the form of a speech in the Chamber of the U.S. House.

Jimmy Carter delivered all four of his State of the Union addresses in written form. Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower delivered their final SOTU’s in writing.

In the hyper-connected world of 2016, though, there was no chance that President Barack Obama would send up a written text.

In an election cycle that allows us (forces us) to watch and/or hear Donald Trump live multiple times each and every day, it would have been silly for the President to have passed on a chance to reach out to a large TV audience to do what he does best: Deliver a speech.

However, it did not appear to me that this was among Mr. Obama’s best efforts.

I am not a huge fan of the President’s policies – to the extent we have been able to figure out what those policies are – but he is a skilled public speaker. In fact, that’s his strongest point.

He looked and sounded as if this speech was largely staff-driven and written, meaning the staff wrote it with the President’s voice in their heads, but it didn’t have his touch. He sounded halting and the clauses were choppy.

As we have discussed before, we used to watch Bill Clinton deliver SOTU’s from the Speaker’s suite and comment negatively on every comma and semi-colon. But, we knew, as we watched, the Clinton was nailing it. He rarely whiffed on a major speech.

After seven years, there is not much the President – any President – can say, or promise, or claim, or (for that matter) deny. We know a lot about what his interests are and what he doesn’t much care about.

A last State of the Union speech allows Presidents to direct the focus of the Congress on the Administration’s final lap.

President Obama has not done well convincing Americans that he is good at running the country. His job approval has been mired in the low- to mid-40s for more than a year.

Now that the focus of those who are interested in politics and policy is shifting from Congress and the White House to the primary and caucus states, this speech might have been his last chance to end his Presidency with anything better than a mediocre legacy.

It’s wasn’t a bad speech. It was, unfortunately, a mediocre speech.

 

Mr. Galen is a veteran political strategist and communications consultant.  He blogs at www.Mullings.com.

The column was originally published at Mullings.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
January 16, 2016
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Nevada News & Views: May 20, 2023

NN&V StaffMay 20, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Laxalt Formally Gives His Support to Ted Cruz
Sell a cookie, go to jail