U.S. Supreme Court to hear challenge on homelessness ordinance ban

A homeless encampment under an underpass in 2018.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Grendelkhan

(Kenneth Schrupp) – The U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear a landmark challenge to an earlier ruling preventing enforcement of anti-camping ordinances — a challenge that was supported by a broad coalition of Republican and Democratic leaders, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom.

“California has invested billions to address homelessness, but rulings from the bench have tied the hands of state and local governments to address this issue,” said Newsom in a statement. “The Supreme Court can now correct course and end the costly delays from lawsuits that have plagued our efforts to clear encampments and deliver services to those in need.”

Monday’s news < 10 minutesclose

Next

Stay

volume_off

-4:55

sd

share

closed_caption

fullscreen

Auto (225p)

225p

360p

Subtitles Off

Subtitles EN

English

Dior designer spotlights moire on Paris runway

1:07

Monday’s news < 10 minutes

4:55

British drivers tackle muddy hills in unusual race

1:09

Paraplegic adventurer to sit-skit across the South Pole

1:33

Remembering past top prospects

2:32

Karl Marx’s London cemetery seeks new lease of life

1:32

Croatian driver offers free rides on vintage bus

1:20

Acid attack survivor fronts fashion book

1:18

Peru celebrates Paso horse with competition

0:39

India counts down to opening of grand temple

0:52

arrow_back_ios_new

arrow_forward_ios

That ruling determined cities cannot enforce anti-camping ordinances if inadequate shelter beds are available for their local homeless populations. Other judges have used this ruling to make more strict standards on a local level that must be met for homeless encampments to be cleared.

The ruling applies to Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, the Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon and Washington.

Under the ruling, which states, “[e]ven where shelter is unavailable, an ordinance prohibiting sitting, lying, or sleeping outside at particular times or in particular locations might well be constitutionally permissible,” some cities have attempted to create more limited, time-and-place specific ordinances.

One city seeking to find the limits of Martin v. Boise is Grants Pass, Oregon, which passed an ordinance banning homeless individuals from using bedding, sleeping bags, or other material used for bedding purposes, or using stoves, lighting fires, or erecting structures of any kind while still allowing them to sleep in city parks. In Gloria Johnson et al. v. City of Grants Pass, the Ninth Circuit ruled again against anti-camping ordinances, with the majority of judges stating, “The City claims homeless persons are free to sleep in City parks, but only without items necessary to facilitate sleeping outdoors.”

While statewide occupancy numbers are not available, a 2017 analysis by the county-wide Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority found shelters run by LAHSA had a system-wide average 78% utilization rate, well short of the 90% required in their contracts. With LAHSA 2017 data finding the county had 16,623 shelter beds and 40,082 unsheltered homeless individuals, that means the city had a rough average of 3,657 shelter beds on a given night. Assuming a steady utilization rate with LAHSA’s 2022 bed and homeless totals, it’s likely the LAHSA system has approximately 5,558 beds available on a given night, or enough for the majority of San Francisco’s entire homeless population. Should the Supreme Court overturn Martin v. Boise, it’s likely cities across America’s Ninth Circuit purview would adopt more stringent anti-camping laws and place more homeless individuals into shelters or behavioral mental health or substance abuse treatment centers.

By

Kenneth Schrupp | The Center Square