• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

3-Point Reality Check for Anti-Sugar Program Critic

3-Point Reality Check for Anti-Sugar Program Critic
Chuck Muth
January 14, 2015

In a recent op-ed published by Reason.com, Greg Beato beats the same drums anti-sugar natives here in the U.S. have been beating for decades.  Abiding by the Rule of Three, let’s “reality check” a trio of his main points…

1.)  Beato maintains that “consumers are getting screwed” by the U.S. sugar program that prevents artificially cheap sugar from flooding our market and warns us not to “expect a price cut on Snickers bars any time soon.”  But that opinion defies reality.

The reality is that the cost of U.S. produced sugar today is roughly the same as it was three decades ago.  So the fact that the cost of, say, a Snickers bar is now roughly 300% higher than it was 30 years ago indicates that there’s something other than the cost of sugar responsible for higher prices.

Also belying the claim that food manufacturers will pass cost savings through to consumers, the cost of sugar dropped some 50% back in 2012-13…yet the cost of sugar-infused products ROSE during the same time.

2.)  Beato cynically claims that campaign contributions from sugar producers are responsible for the continuation of the present U.S. sugar program.  This assumes the battle in Congress pits the almighty U.S. sugar industry against little old ladies baking cakes for a Sunday church sale.

That’s just silly.  The reality is that U.S. sugar farmers continue to battle for protection from artificially cheap, foreign government-subsidized imported sugar against extremely wealthy multinational food companies – such as Hershey, Mars, Nestle and the Grocery Manufacturers of America – who have themselves hired the best “K Street” lobbyists money can buy.

The only reason Congress continues the U.S. sugar policy is because it’s the correct public policy in light of the current global market of foreign government subsidies.

3.)  Armed with nothing but his own opinion, Beato categorically declares that “America’s food security would in no way be jeopardized by the loss of our domestic sugar industry.”  But that flies in the face of the reality of the European Union experience.

Years ago, the EU unilaterally disarmed and allowed unfettered importation of artificially cheap sugar.  Almost immediately thereafter, 83 sugar mills closed, 130,000 workers lost jobs and sugar prices skyrocketed.  Indeed, grocery shoppers paid 20% more for food as tight supplies plagued Europe.  That’s because foreign suppliers filled their own markets before stocking Europe.

Nobody likes the U.S. sugar program.  Not even the U.S. sugar industry.  But as long as foreign governments continue to subsidize their inefficient sugar producing operations, the reality is that Congress is going to keep protecting our own.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
January 14, 2015
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Nevada News & Views: May 20, 2023

NN&V StaffMay 20, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Neither Left nor Right has a True Governing Mandate
Look Out Nevadans, Here Comes the “Gruber Tax”!