• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

College fee hikes: Why my answer is still no

College fee hikes: Why my answer is still no
Chuck Muth
March 7, 2014

(Ron Knecht) – Today, Nevada regents consider general fee increases for our colleges and universities.  Administrators seek four percent annual hikes for four years for resident undergraduates and lower percentages for non-resident and graduate students, who pay much higher fees.

As I’ve done for three years on general fee increases, I’ll oppose them.

The key fact is this: in-state fees at UNR and UNLV doubled in real (inflation-adjusted) terms in the last dozen years, but real incomes of Nevada families paying those fees declined slightly.  (Fees at our other colleges increased 50 percent to 80 percent.)

Two things have driven the increases: weak cost management in higher education and cuts in state support.  So, administrators and regents have compensated by raising fees.

In the private sector, market competition decreases real costs over time and increases the value of goods and services delivered.  (If it didn’t lead to continually doing more with less, we’d still live in caves and trees.)  For example, 90 years ago, 25 percent of the average family budget was spent on food.  Today, food takes less than ten percent and we get more convenience, more nutritious and varied diets, and much more dining out.

Government and education (the sector most controlled by government) do not reap good long-term gains.  Instead, they are slow in technological progress, innovation and business-model change.  These cost-management problems cause them to consume ever-growing fractions of our incomes.  Why?  They lack the discipline of market competition, and run instead on the political allocation of resources that favors resistance to change, administrative bloat, and incumbent providers over challengers and consumers.

In Nevada, state spending on the two largest budget sectors – K-12 schools and health and human services – and total state spending have all increased significantly, especially in the Great Recession and wretched recovery caused by government excess.  However, higher education and the rest of the state budget have joined the incomes of families and businesses in real decline.  Tax cuts played no role because taxes actually rose.

That the recent decline in total instructional spending, adjusted for changing university and college enrollments, approximates the rate of decrease in Nevadans’ incomes is appropriate.  But it’s only a start to remedying long-term poor cost management.

One can argue that a decade ago taxpayers were paying too much of higher education’s freight – about two-thirds, with students’ families paying one-third.  However, due to fee increases and cuts in state support, the burden is now roughly evenly split.

Research shows that higher education delivers public benefits to society at large and not just private benefits to students.  So, it is reasonable for taxpayers to carry perhaps half the load.  K-12 costs are overwhelmingly subsidized by the public for just this reason.

Apologists for the allegedly “moderate” increases note that other states have adopted similar hikes and that Nevada’s fees are in the mainstream for comparable institutions.  Besides the fact that some of the high-cost allegedly comparable universities – California, Washington and others – are not comparable to UNLV and UNR, there’s a more basic problem.  Namely, all those institutions also suffer the same weak cost-management problems and undue favoritism for K-12 and HHS that Nevada colleges do; that standard is too low.

American higher education may lead the world, but recent polls show that business leaders and the public do not share our sanguine view of our performance.  Considering the hikes of recent years, we need to skip the increases and focus on innovation, improved value and cost management.

(Ron Knecht of Carson City is an economist, law school graduate and Nevada higher education regent.)

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
March 7, 2014
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Government

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

Amodei vs. Biden: Debunking Misinformation on Debt and Border Policies

NN&V StaffMay 23, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Lombardo’s Veto Message on AB354 (Gun Control)

NN&V StaffMay 17, 2023
Read More

Lombardo’s Veto Message on AB355 (Gun Control)

NN&V StaffMay 17, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Sugar Policy Critic Really Just Hates Sugar
Brazil Sweetens the Sugar Subsidy Pot