• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Commission Sells Out To Unions

Commission Sells Out To Unions
N&V Staff
September 7, 2011

(Michael Chamberlain/Nevada Business Coalition) – The Clark County Commission today bowed to the wishes of local trade unions as it voted to appeal a court’s decision prohibiting it from using an agreement it had negotiated with those unions on a local construction project.

The unanimous vote of the Commission will delay the start of the project, which all agree is urgent. But apparently not so urgent that it was worth opposing the will of the unions.

Last month District Court Judge Jerry Wiese prevented the County from awarding the contract for the Clark County Detention Center Phase I remodel project under the terms of the Project Labor Agreement the County had negotiated with the unions. Judge Wiese ruled the PLA violated Nevada’s competitive bidding laws by unfairly favoring unions at the expense of non-union workers and contractors.

A PLA is an agreement between unions and project owners, often governments, that govern a construction project and that contractors are forced to agree to as a condition of obtaining the contract. It dictates that both union and non-union contractors must hire workers from union halls, contribute to union benefit funds, pay union wages and follow union work rules while generally prohibiting strikes and work stoppages due to jurisdictional disputes between unions.

A handful of people testified about the PLA at the hearing today, all but one in favor of the PLA. However, not a single argument in favor actually dealt with the PLA.

Every single comment supporting the PLA involved, instead, prevailing wage, which has absolutely nothing to do with the PLA. This project, as are all County projects over $100,000, will be a prevailing wage project with or without a PLA.

In April, the Nevada Business Coalition and the Associated Builders and Contractors of Nevada had sued the County to prevent it from using this particular PLA on the Detention Center project.

The County could have chosen to award the contract without the PLA, allowing construction to begin. It also could have chosen to remove the offending provisions from the PLA.

However, neither of those options would have pleased the unions because contractors would have been free to use unlimited non-union workers and would not have been forced to pay into union benefit funds, even for workers who will never collect those benefits.

The County Commission today opted to take the matter to the Nevada Supreme Court rather than oppose the unions and accept the decision of the District Court.

(Michael Chamberlain is Executive Director of Nevada Business Coalition.)

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsClark County CommissionPLAproject labor agreementunions
Government
September 7, 2011
N&V Staff

Related ItemsClark County CommissionPLAproject labor agreementunions

More in Government

Myth-Buster: Sugar Policy Misconception Debunked

N&V StaffFebruary 23, 2021
Read More

Cheat Sugar, Not Cheap Sugar, is the Problem

N&V StaffFebruary 16, 2021
Read More

India Battling Sugar Subsidy Addiction

N&V StaffJanuary 25, 2021
Read More

Sisolak’s Proposed Budget a Slap Across Nevada’s Face

N&V StaffJanuary 21, 2021
Read More

Katie Williams Predicts Return to Clark County Classrooms in February

N&V StaffJanuary 21, 2021
Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Restores In-Person Requirement for Chemical Abortions

N&V StaffJanuary 14, 2021
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics Muth's Truths business government Government Opinion Obama News Donald Trump GOP Republicans Ron Knecht Adam Laxalt

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Gunslinger Battles Bureaucracy Blob
White House Content With 9% Unemployment