A battle over the balance of power is heating up in Washington, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt calls out federal judges for blocking President Donald Trump’s executive actions.
According to Leavitt, “activist judges in liberal districts” are abusing their authority to derail the President’s policies—sparking what she calls a “constitutional crisis.”
The controversy stems from a series of court rulings that have put key parts of Trump’s agenda on hold.
Among the most recent judicial roadblocks: a federal judge temporarily halted political appointees from accessing Treasury Department records, and others have issued injunctions against executive orders related to federal funding and immigration policy.
The administration argues these rulings go far beyond the courts’ authority and amount to judicial interference in the functions of the Executive Branch.
Speaking from the White House podium, Leavitt made it clear that the administration is fed up with what it sees as judicial overreach.
“This is not about upholding the law—it’s about leftist judges trying to block the President from doing his job,” she said. “They are using the courts as a political weapon, and that is not how our system is supposed to work.”
Vice President JD Vance echoed this sentiment, specifically calling out the Treasury records ruling.
He argued that these judges are attempting to “micromanage” the administration’s decisions and that such interference is “completely unconstitutional.”
Of course, not everyone sees it that way. Democrats and left-leaning legal scholars insist that the judiciary is simply doing its job—serving as a check on executive power.
They claim Trump’s policies often push legal boundaries and that the courts are merely upholding the rule of law.
Some legal experts argue that judicial review is essential to preventing executive overreach. Others worry that if the administration refuses to accept these rulings, it could create a deeper constitutional crisis.
This fight isn’t happening in a vacuum.
It’s unfolding as conservatives push back against what they see as an entrenched, activist judiciary that routinely thwarts policies they support.
Many on the right argue that unelected judges should not have the power to block executive actions indefinitely, especially when those actions are consistent with the President’s constitutional authority.
There’s also the question of nationwide injunctions—where a single judge can halt a federal policy across the entire country. Critics on the right say this practice has no basis in law and is a relatively new judicial tactic used to stall conservative policies.
For now, the courts continue to press forward, and the Trump administration continues to fight back.
If these cases reach the Supreme Court, a ruling could clarify the extent of judicial power over executive decisions. With a conservative-leaning Supreme Court, many on the right are hopeful that the president’s authority will be upheld.
One thing is certain—this battle isn’t going away anytime soon. As long as judges keep stepping in to block conservative policies, expect the Trump administration to keep pushing back.
This article was written with the assistance of AI. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
