Cortez Masto Attacks $12B for Destroying Iranian Terrorist Regime, Ignores $200B in Fraud

Posted By


 

It’s always amazing what Democrat politicians choose to worry about.

This week, Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV) blasted President Trump over $12 billion spent targeting Iran’s terrorist regime, claiming that money could have gone to programs like Medicaid in Nevada.

That sounds serious. Twelve billion dollars is real money. No doubt about it.

But here’s the problem. In Washington, that number isn’t even close to where the real waste is happening.

Start with one state. Minnesota.

Federal investigators have uncovered what could be up to $9 billion in fraud across welfare programs in recent years.

One case alone involved over $250 million stolen from a child nutrition program using fake invoices and kickbacks.

Prosecutors said some Medicaid programs saw fraud make up half the spending.

Half. That’s not a budgeting problem. That’s a system failure.

Now zoom out.

The Government Accountability Office reported $162 billion in improper federal payments in just one year. Since 2003, those improper payments add up to more than $2.8 trillion.

Trillion.

That’s the kind of number that should keep lawmakers up at night.

And yet, when it comes time to talk about spending, Democrat politicians such as Sen. Cortez Masto suddenly get very focused on national defense.

Here’s another example.

Medicare and Medicaid, the same programs Cortez Masto says are being “cut,” have between $85 billion and $95 billion in improper payments every single year.

That includes overpayments, ineligible recipients, and plain old bad paperwork.

Even the SNAP food stamp program loses about $10 to $11 billion a year in improper payments.

That’s basically the same amount she’s upset about with Iran. Every year. One program.

Then there’s pandemic spending.

Unemployment insurance fraud alone is estimated at $100 to $135 billion, and some experts say it could be as high as $400 billion.

COVID relief loans like PPP and EIDL? Another $200 billion in potentially fraudulent payments.

Let that sink in.

We’re not talking about one-time mistakes. We’re talking about a pattern. A system that leaks money at a massive scale while today’s DC politicians defend it and demand more funding.

Fact is, there’s a big difference between spending money to stop a hostile regime and losing money because nobody is watching the store.

Iran isn’t a paperwork problem. It’s a real threat. A regime that funds terrorism, destabilizes the region, and has long pursued nuclear capabilities.

That’s not the same as a bloated program sending checks to people who shouldn’t be getting them.

And here’s where the Nevada angle matters.

When Cortez Masto talks about Medicaid “cuts,” what she often means are efforts to clean up these exact problems.

Removing ineligible recipients. Tightening verification. Reducing fraud.

That’s not taking money away from families. That’s making sure the money actually goes to the right families.

Think of it like this.

If your household budget was leaking thousands of dollars a year because of fraud or mistakes, would you keep spending more? Or would you fix the leak first?

Most Nevadans know the answer. Washington doesn’t seem to.

And that’s why this debate matters.

Not because $12 billion is nothing. But because focusing on that while ignoring hundreds of billions in waste isn’t serious leadership. It sounds like avoiding accountability.

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.