• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Dodd Finance Bill an Attack on Main Street

Dodd Finance Bill an Attack on Main Street
N&V Staff
April 26, 2010

(Chuck Muth) – As Congress prepares to vote on debating Chris Dodd’s “Restoring American Financial Stability Act,” a broad spectrum of conservative and free-market groups, including Citizen Outreach, have expressed in a letter “grave concerns” about the financial regulation bill and its negative impact on Main Street. Text of the coalition letter is as follows:

April 23, 2010

Dear Senators Reid and McConnell,

As leaders of groups representing millions of Americans that comprise a Center-Right Coalition, we have grave concerns about the “Restoring American Financial Stability Act” and its negative impact on Main Street. While we believe the government should act swiftly to punish financial fraud, it should not diminish Americans’ choices and opportunities in the name of “stability.”

We believe that fundamentally, as with health care, although there are a lot of complexities involved, this is about the future of our country. Do we continue living in an America where entrepreneurs and investors can launch new businesses and new ideas — or do we live under a system in which almost every transaction has to be approved by a government agency or czar?!

Below is a by-no-means exclusive list of our concerns about provisions that hurt Main Street.

1. Main Street non-financial businesses would be hit with taxation, regulation, and possible nationalization by the Federal Reserve: Defenders the $50 billion upfront resolution (bailout) fund argue that the money would come not from general taxpayer funds but fees on “financial institutions.” But putting aside the fact that even taxes on big banks would be passed on to depositors and borrowers, the bill’s definition of “financial institution” subject to the fee and regulation by the Federal Reserve goes far beyond a bank or stockbroker.

Life, home and auto insurers would be subject to this bailout fund fee even though they already pay into state funds for insolvent insurance companies, and the fee would then be passed on to their policy holders. The Federal Reserve would also have the power to define a “nonbank financial company” to encompass any business it deems as “substantially engaged” in financial activity, and experts fear this definition could include energy companies and manufacturers tangentially involved in finance and credit. These firms would be subject not just to the bailout fees, but to the Fed’s new powers of breakup and nationalization for firms it deems “systemic.”

2. “Proxy access” and corporate governance provisions would take power from states and empower progressive interest groups — from unions to animal rights: Even though they have little justification in preventing the next financial crisis, the bill contains “proxy access” provisions that would empower union pension funds and other progressives by forcing companies to fund their Saul Alinsky-style campaigns for a company’s board of directors. Combined with other items federalizing incorporation law — like a mandated majority instead of plurality standard for director votes– this could enable special interest activists to harm the interests of ordinary shareholders and encourage corporate directors to cut deals with them on things like card check, cap-and-trade, and kicking conservative media personalities off the air.

3. What’s not in the bill — any reform of Fannie and Freddie: The bill ignores the two of the primary causes of the crisis: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They’re bigger than ever, and the Obama administration quietly lifted the $400 billion cap on government backing on Christmas Eve — the “Christmas bailout” — so now taxpayers have unlimited liability for them. A bill aiming to prevent the next crisis is woefully insufficient without reform of Fannie and Freddie, and could have the unintended effect of allowing them to carry the risks that other businesses would be barred from taking.

We are happy to meet with you or members of your staff to discuss further these vital concerns.

Sincerely,

John Berlau, Director, Center for Investors and Entrepreneurs, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
Chuck Muth, President, Citizen Outreach
Jennifer Hulsey, Co-Founder, American Grassroots Coalition
Dick Patten, President, American Family Business Institute
Tim Phillips, President, Americans for Prosperity
Gary Aldrich, Chairman, CNP Action
Phyllis Schlafly, President and Founder, Eagle Forum
Myron Ebell, Director, Freedom Action
Colin Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring
Amy Ridenour, President, National Center for Public Policy Research
Lewis Uhler, President, National Tax Limitation Committee
Pete Sepp, Executive Vice President, National Taxpayers Union
William Greene, President, RightMarch.com
Jim Martin, Chairman, 60 Plus Association
Lisa Miller, Organizer, Tea Party WDC
Amy Kremer, Director, Grassroots and Coalitions, Tea Party Express

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
April 26, 2010
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Government

Zero for Zero the Solution to Global Sugar Subsidies

N&V StaffApril 26, 2022
Read More

Sugar Shortages and Shopping Cart Fights

N&V StaffMarch 28, 2022
Read More

Making a Sugar Mountain Out of a Sugar Molehill

N&V StaffMarch 23, 2022
Read More

Rosen, Masto Should Oppose Sohn Nomination to FCC

N&V StaffMarch 23, 2022
Read More

U.S. Sugar Policy Stands as Model Against Economic Surrender

N&V StaffMarch 16, 2022
Read More

Sugar Lesson from Ukraine: Food Security is National Security

N&V StaffMarch 11, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Obama Muth’s Truths Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

An outline of the Budgeting for Outcomes process
Assemblymen Clash over New AZ Immigration Law