• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

I Pledge Allegiance, To The Pledge

I Pledge Allegiance, To The Pledge
Chuck Muth
June 10, 2011

(Chuck Muth) – In response to my column the other day about how and why the left hates the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist Steve Sebelius wrote the following in today’s paper [June 8, 2011]:

“That brings us to the Americans for Tax Reform pledge overseen most vigorously in Nevada by my friend Chuck Muth. He said in a recent Internet message that liberals hate the pledge because it’s effective. All Republicans who signed the no-tax pledge ended up voting against taxes, Muth reports.

“Of course they did. And it’s a fair bet none of them even considered any other course. That doesn’t make them courageous, smart or good legislators. It just makes them inured to reasonable counter-arguments. And in the end, it made them wholly irrelevant, because who needs to negotiate with those who cannot compromise, especially when they comprise a minority of a minority?”

Gotta respectfully disagree. 

The Pledge signers absolutely WERE courageous.  In this day and age of politicians never taking a firm principled position on any issue, to take such a stand – incurring the wrath of the left and the liberal media in the process – takes courage. 

And in the last election cycle, monied special interests absolutely threatened candidates who signed the Pledge; warning that Pledge signers wouldn’t get campaign contributions.  And I can assure you a number of self-proclaimed conservative GOP legislative candidates who didn’t sign the Pledge didn’t sign for exactly that reason. 

In other words, they compromised their principles in the face of big-money donors BEFORE they even got into office.

So is it really any surprise that they caved and folded at the end of this session?  I mean, if you can’t stand up to the special interests before you get elected, how are you ever going to stand up to them after? 

In that regard, Pledge signers tell us an awful lot about their true commitment to doing the right thing, even when threatened politically.  Any yahoo can “say” on the campaign trail they oppose tax hikes; but it takes true courage to back those words up by putting your John Hancock on a piece of paper.

SIDEBAR: Which reminds me, wasn’t the Declaration of Independence a written “pledge?”  Why, yes it was:

“(W)e mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.” 

Those right-wing ideologue Founding Fathers.  Why couldn’t they just learn to “compromise” and go along to get along?  What losers! 

Secondly, Steve maintains that the Pledge signers were rendered “wholly irrelevant” at the end of the session.  Well, not exactly.

The power of the Pledge isn’t so much in an individual signing the Pledge, but in electing a sufficient number to thwart any and all efforts to increase taxes.  Even though six of the ten Republicans in the Senate actually signed the Pledge, when all ten united as a bloc to oppose the extension of the tax hikes, they were extremely relevant.

For most of the session, tax hikes were dead, dead, dead – thanks to unified opposition.  And if just two of the four Senate sell-outs had kept their word and opposed extending the sunsets, there’d have been no extension of the sunsets.  Period.

Look, legislating is a counting game.  If there are eight Pledge signers in the Senate, the tax hiking side can’t get the two-thirds supermajority it needs to raise taxes and use the money to grow government.  It’s simple math.  The only reason Pledge signers were wholly irrelevant at the end of the session is because we were two Pledge signers short.

All that said, why is it that only conservatives are supposed to compromise their principles?

Did Democrats compromise on ending collective bargaining for government workers, which has resulted in nearly bankrupting local governments? 

Did Democrats compromise on school vouchers so that low-income parents whose children are trapped in a Failure Factory public school would have the means to send them somewhere else to get a better education?

Did Democrats compromise on ending “prevailing wage,” which is nothing more than a Big Labor welfare program that needlessly drives up the taxpayer cost for public works projects?

Did Democrats compromise on reigning in lawsuit abuse by trial lawyers who are having a field day, for example, suing plumbers for alleged “construction defects” in roofing?

Did Democrats compromise on NOT raising taxes?

Again, why is it that only Republicans are supposed to “compromise” on a core issue, hmmmm?

Former Sen. Bill Raggio loves to say “compromise” isn’t a four-letter word.  Well – neither is “no.”

Bottom line: The problem for fiscal conservatives isn’t that some Republicans had the courage to sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge; it’s that not enough of them did.  Which goes back to one of my favorite sayings which I believe was coined by the Club for Growth:

It’s not enough to just elect more Republicans; you need to elect better ones, as well.

Amen.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
June 10, 2011
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

How the GOP Lost Jacksonville

NN&V StaffMay 18, 2023
Read More

The Dark Side of Wealth Taxes: Why Nevada Should Say No

NN&V StaffMay 12, 2023
Read More

Nohra: GOED vs. State Senator: A Showdown Over Tax Reductions in Nevada

NN&V StaffMay 10, 2023
Read More

Washoe Commissioner Throttles Citizen Speech

NN&V StaffMay 2, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

What’s A Little Dissembling Among Friends?
Bin Laden’s Death Is Not An “All-Clear” Signal