You really can’t make this stuff up.
Nevada’s housing crisis isn’t exactly breaking news. Like other states, we’re facing skyrocketing rents and not enough homes.
Even the left-leaning Brookings Institute admits we’re behind by 4.9 million housing units across the country.
So, what do Nevada Democrats think will fix this?
Limit the number of homes that can be built.
Seriously.
The Common Sense Crisis
Just as Gov. Joe Lombardo introduced his comprehensive, pro-growth housing plan (AB540) last week, Democrats in Carson City were busy pushing more government control — this time in the form of Assemblywoman Sandra Jauregui’s rent control bill.
Because nothing encourages builders to create new housing like threatening their ability to manage what they build, right?
But the hits keep coming.
This week, Senate Democrats heard Senate Bill 391 — a bill that reads like it was written by someone who thinks landlords are villains straight out of a Disney movie.
What SB391 Would Actually Do
SB391 would limit single-family rental homes (SFRs) in new developments.
Let’s be clear: In the middle of a housing shortage, they want to ban the construction of more housing.
Genius.
SFRs are one of the fastest-growing and most flexible housing options for working families.
They help people live in better neighborhoods, closer to good schools, and in homes with yards — without needing a 20% down payment.
But rather than cut red tape, reform zoning, or speed up permits, Democrats want to punish the private sector.
The Danger of Being One Vote Away
Now here’s the part that should really concern free-market conservatives: Democrats are one GOP vote away from getting a super-majority on bills this session. And SB391 will need a two-thirds vote to pass.
And Republican State Sen. Ira Hansen crossed party lines and voted with the Democrats to advance the bill out of committee and is likely to vote for it on the floor (he voted for a similar bill last session).
Hansen claimed the housing market is already “artificially manipulated” – which is ironic because that’s exactly the excuse big-government liberals have used to attack Walmart, Home Depot, and other big businesses they don’t like.
Now, with one Republican showing a willingness to jump ship, every bill becomes vulnerable — not just this one.
Meaning Democrats are one vote away from jamming through their far-left wish list: tax hikes, new regulations, and more progressive nonsense that makes life harder for Nevada families.
Who Pays the Price?
Let’s be real: SB391 isn’t just a bad bill. It’s a dangerous one.
If passed, home values could drop, property taxes could go up, and cities could be forced to cut essential services — like police, fire, and parks.
And yes, families could be evicted from homes they’re already living in — all in the name of “fairness” and “housing stability.”
Why?
Because, in typical Dina Neal fashion, her neighbor made an uninformed real estate decision. That’s why she brought forth this bill.
That’s not a joke — it’s on the record.
The Real Solution: Less Government, Not More
The private sector has the tools, resources, and incentive to build more homes faster and more affordably than any government program ever could.
Professionally managed rental homes strengthen communities, expand housing choices, and help families get ahead.
Instead of working with the builders and landlords solving the problem, Democrats are working against them — and, by extension, against you, the taxpayer footing the bill for their bad ideas.
What You Can Do
If you’re tired of being priced out, taxed out, and regulated out of your own neighborhood…
Call your legislators and tell them to vote “NO” on SB391.
Let’s build more homes — not more bureaucracy.
This article was written with the assistance of AI. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
