• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

NV Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on Schmidt vs Kieckhefer

NV Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on Schmidt vs Kieckhefer
Chuck Muth
August 31, 2015

(Peter Hennessey) – Oral arguments in the case of Gary Schmidt (appellant) vs. Ben Kieckhefer (respondent) will be heard before the full panel of the Nevada Supreme Court.

The court order specifying the time and place is in the court document 15-23090.

Date: Wednesday, Sept 2, 2015
Time: 1:30 PM
Place: Nevada Supreme Court, 201 South Carson Street, Courtroom-Second Floor, Carson City
Case no.: 66528
Before: En Banc
Justices: Gibbons, Douglas, Pickering, Hardesty, Cherry, Parraguirre, Saitta

The case history is shown here.

This case involves the lower court’s restraining order, issued at Nevada State Senator Ben Kieckhefer’s request late Fridaynight immediately before the primaries in June 2014, against a TV ad that candidate in Senate District 16 Gary Schmidt was running at the time on Reno TV stations. The facts of the case are summarized in the court document 14-31048, which is downloadable from the link above.

Gary Schmidt has emphasized two important points about this case:

1. This is a clear example of prior restraint on political free speech, that is, a First Amendment issue, which is traditionally of the highest priority for the courts. And therefore,

2. The oral arguments are being heard “en banc“ which means that the entire court, all seven justices, are hearing it. This is unusual, as normally only a panel of three justices hears a case.

This case has not only attracted widespread interest, but the media have also universally criticized the district court judge’s decision.The media and the press are invited to hear the oral arguments.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
August 31, 2015
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Caldara: The GOP’s Master Plan to Keep Losing

NN&V StaffFebruary 3, 2024
Read More

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2024 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Born in the USA — but it is up to Congress to say whether that qualifies for citizenship
ACLU suit over education savings accounts is a challenge to parental rights