• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Obama-Care Passes, Lone Republican Vote Bought Off by White House

Obama-Care Passes, Lone Republican Vote Bought Off by White House
Chuck Muth
November 8, 2009

(Chuck Muth) – The first stage of a full-blown government take-over of the nation’s health care system passed in the United States House of Representatives 220-215 late Saturday night.

Only one Republican, Rep. Joseph Cao (R-La.) voted for the bill (H.R. 3962) which experts say will cost Americans over a trillion dollars. Cao cast his vote in favor of the bill only after it obtained the 218 Democrat votes it needed for passage – thus Cao denied the GOP a unanimous vote in opposition by casting an unneeded vote.

In a statement issued by his office after the vote, Cao explained that the White House had bought off his vote earlier in the day.

“Today, I obtained a commitment from President Obama that he and I will work together to address the critical health care issues of Louisiana,” Cao wrote, “including the FMAP crisis and community disaster loan forgiveness, as well as issues related to Charity and Methodist Hospitals.”

Of Nevada’s three House representatives, only Congressman Dean Heller (R) voted against H.R. 3962. Congresswomen Shelley Berkley (D) and Dina Titus (D) both voted with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in favor of the bill.

“Tonight, Rep. Dina Titus voted to turn one-sixth of the U.S. economy over to government bureaucrats,” said Jahan Wilcox, spokesman for the Republican National Committee. “A vote for the Obama-Pelosi health care bill means higher taxes on Nevada families and small businesses, cuts to Medicare for Nevada’s seniors, and an increase in premiums when Nevada families go to the doctor.

“Rep. Titus has pulled the classic Washington move,” Wilcox continued, noting that Titus had earlier expressed opposition to the bill. “She says one thing to her constituents, but when she is back in Washington, she votes against their interests.”

Heller issued the following statement after the vote:

“Today America is less free. Granting massive government intrusion into individuals healthcare choices will ultimately lead to fewer choices for Americans. This bill needlessly expands the federal government, raises taxes on small businesses, cuts benefits to seniors, and imposes criminal penalties on Americans who don’t purchase bureaucrat-approved health insurance.

“As Nevadans struggle and our nation is experiencing high unemployment, the House passed a bill is expected to destroy 5 million jobs. Massive government expansion and higher taxes is not the reform our nation needs. There is a reason why members of Congress have excluded themselves from this bill.”

Heller offered three amendments to House Rules Committee for consideration. The Heller amendments would have required enforceable citizenship verification measures, mandated that Members of Congress participate in the government-run health plan created by the bill, included medical liability reform, debt forgiveness for doctors who practice in underserved communities, and encouraged prescription drug reimportation.

However, the majority party allowed none of the amendments to proceed for floor consideration.

The bill now moves over to the Senate and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), where prospects of passage appear much more dicey. Indeed, passage in the House was considered to be the “easy” part for Democrats, and they only barely got it done by two votes.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
November 8, 2009
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Caldara: The GOP’s Master Plan to Keep Losing

NN&V StaffFebruary 3, 2024
Read More

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2024 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Amodei’s Online Troubles Continue
Angle says unemployment numbers are wake-up call to failed policy