• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Oregon Tax Increase a Lesson for Nevada

Oregon Tax Increase a Lesson for Nevada
Chuck Muth
September 23, 2010

(Jim Clark) – As the two leading gubernatorial candidates criss-cross Nevada promising not to raise taxes leaders in the Nevada Senate and Assembly are quietly looking at new “revenue enhancements” for the Silver State.

State Sen. Steven Horsford (D – Las Vegas) first proposed a corporate income tax but then withdrew the idea. Republican Assembly Minority Leader Pete Goicoechea (R – Elko) proposed a sales tax on food but promptly backed away from the idea when conservative activist Chuck Muth organized a statewide phone campaign urging fellow conservatives to call Goicoechea with the message: “don’t tax my meat, Pete”.

Nevada’s projected $3 billion budget hole is a huge challenge but before rushing to impose new tax levies lawmakers should take a close look at our neighbor to the north. Last January, after years of voting down tax increase proposals, Oregon voters went to the polls and approved, retroactive to 2009, a 20% income tax increases on those making more than $125,000 per year, a 22% hike on those making over $250,000 and business tax increases by as much as 1,400%. Overall the new taxes were expected to increase revenues by 10%. During the campaign tax increase proponents cited the sanctity of the K-12 budget as the primary reason to vote for the increases. This was a big victory for public employee unions who raised $6.85 million to fund the campaign.

After a mere 7 months of the new, higher tax rates Oregon’s budget situation has only grown worse. Despite the increased tax rates Oregon is $577 million below budgeted revenues and term-limited Democratic Governor Ted Kulongoski has been forced to impose across-the-board 9% spending cuts including K-12 education. In the final analysis the school budget got cut anyhow.

Another adverse but expectable reaction to Oregon’s new tax rates was an exodus of business. Medford’s ComNet Marketing, a provider of marketing and fundraising services to non-profits with $5 million in annual sales, is pulling up stakes and moving to . . . yep . . . Nevada. “It was purely a business decision” said CEO Bruce Hough, “since Nevada has no corporate income tax the move will eventually pay off.” He predicted that Oregon’s corporate tax revenues will gradually fall as more businesses see the light and move elsewhere.

“The lesson here” said Greg Leo of the Oregon Republican Party “is that taxing the rich and business actually reduces the amount of revenues collected.” Observing from afar the Las Vegas Review Journal wrote in an editorial about the Oregon phenomena: “Not only is this a another classic example of how individual wage earners adjust their behavior in order to minimize their tax burdens, it again highlights how calls to “stabilize” Nevada’s tax base through creation of a state or corporate income tax would likely have the opposite effect.” Dr. Arnold Laffer, a University of Southern California economist and advisor to the Reagan Administration, devised the “Laffer curve” demonstrating how lower tax rates produce higher tax revenues because the energized economic engine produces more goods and services than at higher rates.

This bad news could come back and haunt Democrats at the polls this year. The most recent Rasmussen poll shows Republican Gubernatorial Candidate Chris Dudley holding a 49% to 44% lead over his Democratic opponent John Kitzhaber in that very blue state.

I hope Oregon’s lesson is not lost on Nevada legislators.

(Jim Clark is President of Republican Advocates, a vice chair of the Washoe County GOP and a member of the Nevada GOP Central Committee. He can be reached at tahoesbjc@aol.com)

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
September 23, 2010
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Nevada News & Views: May 20, 2023

NN&V StaffMay 20, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Harry Reid’s Dirty Dairy Diary
Are You an Extremist?