• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Physicians Warn Of Access Crisis for Nevada Medicaid Patients

Physicians Warn Of Access Crisis for Nevada Medicaid Patients
N&V Staff
May 23, 2011

(Sean Whaley/Nevada News Bureau) – The state’s largest physician advocacy group has sent a letter to Gov. Brian Sandoval and all 63 lawmakers saying that 15 percent cuts in Medicaid reimbursements will make it even more difficult for some Nevadans to receive proper medical care.

Brian Callister, president of the Nevada State Medical Association (NSMA), said: “The proposed 15 percent cuts for most physician services added to the 40-plus percent cuts made since 2008 to obstetrical, pediatric, and anesthesiology services we believe has already resulted in significant access problems for pediatric Medicaid patients.

“Basically, Medicaid physician payment rates are based on 2002 Medicare physician fee rates,” he said. “We have repeatedly voiced our concern that physicians (and other providers) simply will not be able to afford the costs associated with providing care at the reduced rates and Medicaid patients face growing accessibility problems.”

The Nevada Department of Health and Human Services has proposed reimbursement reductions to a variety of health care provider categories as a way of cutting the Medicaid budget for the coming two years.

The Medicaid rate reductions recommended for a variety of medical providers in Sandoval’s initial budget proposal would save nearly $60 million in general funds over the two-year budget.

The Nevada Health Care Association, which represents the skilled nursing industry, has also objected to the reductions and suggested that some facilities could close with the Medicaid reimbursement cuts. The association is staging a rally to raise awareness of the Medicaid cuts at the Legislature on May 17.

The Sandoval administration recently proposed a restoration of some funding to skilled nursing facilities, reducing a $20 per Medicaid resident per day cut to $15.

Health care providers have questioned whether reimbursement reductions imposed purely for budgetary reasons are legal based on federal court rulings.

In the letter, the medical association noted the recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to review the impact on access to care by Medicaid patients when states significantly reduce payment for services.

The issue is a national one resulting from the recession and the growth in the uninsured population eligible for the state and federally funded Medicaid program. It has been reported that the Nevada program has grown by 3,000 people a month since the start of the recession.

The letter also points out also that the federal Department of Health and Human Services has just released new proposed rules that would make it harder for states to balance their budgets by reducing access to Medicaid covered services by reducing payment rates.

“Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a proposed regulation which requires states to conduct a review of patient experiences and demonstrate that Medicaid patients will have sufficient access to care before any proposals for provider payment rate reductions may be submitted,” Callister said in his letter. “The new federal rule would require Nevada to measure and document access to each covered benefit at least every five years.

“We believe that these new access assessments, which will take into account enrollee needs, the availability of care, and the utilization of services, could not justify Nevada’s current policy of maintaining the same payment rates for nine years, and the proposal to cut rates in the 10th and 11th years,” he said.

Legislative Democrats have proposed eliminating the cuts to physician Medicaid payments, but Sandoval has vowed to veto any measures requiring new fees or taxes to fund restorations to the two-year general fund budget.

“We urge the Legislature to eliminate these proposed cuts and to revise the Medicaid payment system to meet the needs of the rapidly growing population eligible and entitled to these covered services,” Callister said.

Otherwise these Nevadans may find that they have been promised benefits that they cannot access, he said.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
May 23, 2011
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Government

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Some Cheerful News on Flat Rate Taxes

N&V StaffOctober 21, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Running On Empty

N&V StaffOctober 6, 2022
Read More

Help a Sheriff Fire a Corrupt Governor?

N&V StaffOctober 4, 2022
Read More

CCSD – MathLITE and Exacerbating the Teacher Shortage

N&V StaffSeptember 29, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Renewable Energy Bills Could Mean Higher Utility Bills
A “Disastrous” Tax Hike for Nevada