• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Public Input is Critical to Federal Land Management

Public Input is Critical to Federal Land Management
N&V Staff
March 6, 2010

(Congressman Dean Heller) – Under the Antiquities Act of 1906, any U.S. President at any time can bypass Congress to establish new or expand existing national monuments. President Bill Clinton created 19 new and 3 enlarged monuments comprising approximately 5.9 million acres of land during his term in office. Only President Jimmy Carter created more monument acreage at 56 million acres in Alaska.

Legislation that was originally enacted to protect small areas of land in imminent danger of destruction has become a backdoor for closing off public lands.

Recently, an internal U.S. Department of the Interior document revealed that two areas within Nevada are under consideration for national monument designations: 1) the Heart of the Great Basin, which would include the Toiyabe, Toquima, and Monitor peaks in Lander, Eureka, and Nye Counties; and 2) the Owyhee Desert, which would affect Elko and Humboldt Counties. According to the document as many as 13 million acres of land throughout the west are at risk for potential designation and it suggests possibly hundreds of millions of dollars in federal land acquisition funds.

Any federal action that could lead to limited access should be done in an open and public manner using extraordinary caution. The Nevada delegation has historically worked together on federal land legislation in an open and transparent process that allows local stakeholders the important opportunity to provide input and help craft final legislation. For this reason, I have introduced legislation that would limit the President’s authority from establishing national monuments in Nevada without congressional authorization. Currently only Wyoming enjoys this exemption from the Act.

Because Nevada is approximately 85% federally controlled, I am particularly sensitive to any actions that could close access to public lands. Public input and local support is critical to the decision-making process when changing federal land designations. As most Nevadans would agree, a transparent public process that includes input from local officials, communities, and stakeholders for any new federal land designations is in the best interest of the residents of our great state. A new national monument under the Antiquities Act could limit access, threaten grazing rights, and end mineral exploration and mining, and even impact private property.

Stakeholders, residents, and local officials should have ample opportunity to provide their input and opinions on the proposal—as well as to evaluate what the impact on local economies would be in the wake of a designation. The fact that this Administration is already circulating internal memos to bypass Congress and the public process is troubling. There should never be a rush to develop proposals that will have long lasting impacts on the local communities and county residents. The Administration should work closely with members of Congress and have public hearings before deciding to designate any national monuments.

As a lifelong Nevadan and outdoorsman, I support access to federal lands and believe that any decision to change use designations should be thoroughly studied. Public input and local support is critical to the decision-making process when changing federal land designations. If a portion of land is truly deserving of protection, then proponents of a national monument, or any other designation, should have nothing to fear from a public process.

(Rep. Heller represents Nevadan’s Second Congressional District)

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
March 6, 2010
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Government

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Some Cheerful News on Flat Rate Taxes

N&V StaffOctober 21, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Running On Empty

N&V StaffOctober 6, 2022
Read More

Help a Sheriff Fire a Corrupt Governor?

N&V StaffOctober 4, 2022
Read More

CCSD – MathLITE and Exacerbating the Teacher Shortage

N&V StaffSeptember 29, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Millennium Scholarship Program Faces Uncertain Future
Gov’t Employees Now Make More Than Private Sector Workers