A 23-year-old international student in Australia, Bao Phuc Cao, was caught secretly filming women in bathrooms.
Not once. Not twice. Police say he had recordings involving up to 150 victims.
You read that right.
And he still walked out of court without a criminal conviction.
After being caught, Cao told police he was “not sure about my gender,” according to news.com.au.
But police didn’t find confusion on his phone. They found a collection of hidden recordings built up over time.
And Cao had already been in trouble before for the same kind of behavior.
He’d been given what amounts to probation. A second chance.
What did he do with it?
Kept going.
The latest incident happened in a shopping center restroom in Melbourne. A woman spotted a phone under the stall.
Security was called. Police stepped in. And when they searched his devices, they found a disturbing collection of videos.
Dozens. Maybe over a hundred.
Women in bathrooms. In showers. In places where people expect privacy.
And the judge chose not to record a conviction.
Instead, Cao got another community-based sentence and was told to go through treatment.
The court described this as “non-contact offending,” even while admitting the harm to victims was serious.
Come on.
If someone hid a camera in your daughter’s bathroom, would you call that “non-contact”?
Or would you call the police and demand justice?
The public backlash in Australia has been fierce. And it should be.
This wasn’t a mistake. This wasn’t a one-time lapse. This was repeated behavior after already getting a break from the system.
At some point, “second chance” turns into “free pass.”
Cao is in Australia on a student visa. Because the judge didn’t record a conviction, deportation isn’t automatic.
Government officials are now reviewing whether they can still cancel his visa on “character grounds.”
Sound familiar?
Here in America, we’re having plenty of debates over public safety and repeat offenders.
Someone gets released, just to turn around and commit another crime. It’s infuriating.
It feels like the system cares more about the offender than the victim.
This is that problem on steroids.
Critics of tough sentencing will say judges need flexibility. They’ll say young people deserve a chance to turn things around. They’ll argue that a criminal record can ruin a life.
But what about the lives of 150 victims?
What about the woman who can’t walk into a public restroom now without wondering if someone’s watching?
There has to be a line. And if this doesn’t cross it, what does?
This is how people lose faith in the system.
Rules are supposed to protect the public. Consequences are supposed to mean something.
When they don’t, people start to wonder if anyone’s really in charge.
Now Australian officials are left trying to clean up the mess by reviewing his visa. They may still deport him, but that’s after the fact.
The court already sent a message. And it wasn’t a good one.
It told victims their suffering wasn’t enough.
It told repeat offenders they might get another pass.
Common sense says this should have ended very differently.
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
