Report gives Nevada manufacturing industry health low marks

Each category included several variables for each state that were aggregated and then ranked. Grades were assigned A through F using a bell curve.

Nevada’s “F” in manufacturing industry health was determined by examining the share of total income earned by manufacturing employees, the wages paid to manufacturing workers relative to other states’ employees, and the share of manufacturing employment per capita.

The state scored a “D” in logistics industry health, which is made up of the capacity to move goods, store inventory and manage the distribution and processing of manufactured goods.

The scorecard noted that logistics firms use many of the same factors as manufacturing firms when deciding where to locate, but “there is a more complex interplay between local conditions and the existing or planned transportation networks of roads, railroads, waterways, and airports.”

The state also ranked a “D” in the human capital category as the report noted that “factories, rail yards, distribution facilities, and machine shops of today are highly technical and complex, and they are dependent on workers who can work successfully in this environment.”

Human capital was called “the most important factor in firm location decisions.”

The sole bright spot for Nevada was worker benefit costs, where the state was given a “B” grade.

The report measured benefit costs by using data on health care premiums, long-term health care costs, workers’ compensation costs per worker, and fringe benefits of all kinds as a share of worker costs.

In the remaining five categories—tax climate, expected fiscal liability gap, global reach, sector diversification and productivity and innovation, Nevada was given an underwhelming “C” grade.

However, not everyone in the state is sold on the report’s mostly poor marks.

“Nevada has had the fastest percentage growth in manufacturing jobs in the nation for the last three years,” said Ray Bacon, a spokesman with the Nevada Manufacturers Association. “The starting point was dismal, but the [Tesla] Gigafactory changed the perception of companies looking for a western location, but not CA because of its challenging laws, policies, taxes and cost.”

The Tesla Gigafactory, scheduled to be completed in 2020, will help produce lithium-ion batteries and serve as an electric vehicle subassembly factory near Reno, Nevada.

Bacon said that most of the workers for the gigafactory will ultimately be Nevada residents as part of the original deal Tesla made with the state.

Commenting on the report specifically, Bacon was a bit skeptical.

He said that without having the proper time to study all their sources, the report “looks a bit suspect.”

Bacon noted that at the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center there are companies — one million square feet in size — which from ground breaking to occupancy were built in six months.

“I challenge you to find any other place in this country where that happens, even rarely.”

He added that in addition data centers for Switch, Apple and Google are under construction as well as several others.

“They chose to be here for a reason, ask them why.”

Keith Paul, a spokesman for the Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development, echoed Bacon’s sentiments.

“Nevada is home to one of the strongest and fastest growing economies in the country,” Paul said.