• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Smalltown Contractor’s Brawl with Big Labor Moves to Federal Court

Smalltown Contractor’s Brawl with Big Labor Moves to Federal Court
N&V Staff
December 2, 2011

A small Elko contractor targeted by a Union will be slugging it out with the Union in court. A judge in Reno has set a December 6 court date for Mach 4 Construction to have its case heard against Operating Engineers Local 3.

The company was unable to come to a settlement agreement with the Union and its Trust Funds earlier this week. The Union once again was unwilling to agree to accept amounts that would allow Mach 4 to stay in business. Judge David Hicks also dismissed the Union’s motion for summary judgment and set the date to hear the case at trial.

Mach 4 will be claiming “unclean hands” on the part of the Union in the dispute. This defense alleges the Union and its Trust Funds have acted unethically or in bad faith.

The company signed what it believed to be a one-year contract with the Union in 2007. While the Union assured the Millers they would be thrilled with the deal and want to extend it, they were anything but. Duncan Miller complained of being sent unqualified workers from the union hall and having to waste time with remedial training of supposedly highly-trained operators.

When the company attempted to terminate the agreement at the end of that year, the Union rejected the termination and today claims Mach 4 has been subject to the terms of the agreement ever since. Because of this the Union and its benefit Trust Funds assert the company owes them in excess of a million dollars in back pay and benefits for union members, even though the company has not used union labor since it attempted to end the deal and its 36 current employees do not want the Union.

Angela Miller, one of the principals of Mach 4, along with her husband Duncan, indicated that the ongoing litigation has hurt the company. Not only is it costly but some potential customers are hesitant to hire Mach 4 because of the possibility the Union could succeed in driving it out of business.

According to Nevada law, were the company to be forced to close its doors the Union could go after its customers for the money it claims it and the Trust Funds are owed by Mach 4. Rather than knuckle under and give up, Mach 4 has chosen to fight.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Business
December 2, 2011
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Business

How to Fix the “Highly Dysfunctional” Global Sugar Market

N&V StaffMarch 29, 2021
Read More

Sugar producers applaud recent comments by USTR Katherine Tai

N&V StaffMarch 17, 2021
Read More

Myth-Buster: Sugar Policy Misconception Debunked

N&V StaffFebruary 23, 2021
Read More

Cheat Sugar, Not Cheap Sugar, is the Problem

N&V StaffFebruary 16, 2021
Read More

India Battling Sugar Subsidy Addiction

N&V StaffJanuary 25, 2021
Read More

Trump, Biden and U.S. Sugar Policy

N&V StaffJanuary 11, 2021
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics Muth's Truths business government Government Opinion Obama News Donald Trump Ron Knecht GOP Republicans Adam Laxalt

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Nevada: First Judicial Hellhole, Now Lending Hellhole
Buying A Foreclosed Home Can Be A Win-Win-Win-Win-Win Situation