• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Sticks and stones

Sticks and stones
N&V Staff
May 8, 2015

Thomas(Thomas Mitchell) – There is no such thing as hate speech, despite what the editorialists at The New York Times would have you believe.

There are just thin skinned and thinner skinned people and explosive ones, like the two jihadists who attempted to attack the Garland draw Muhammad contest.

The answer to speech you hate is never violence or gag laws or campus  policies, but more speech, speech that persuades and wins the day.

Under the headline, Free Speech vs. Hate Speech, the Gray Lady lectured:

“Some of those who draw cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad may earnestly believe that they are striking a blow for freedom of expression, though it is hard to see how that goal is advanced by inflicting deliberate anguish on millions of devout Muslims who have nothing to do with terrorism. As for the Garland event, to pretend that it was motivated by anything other than hate is simply hogwash.”

Anguish is in the eye of beholder.

Are we to blame if we call for tighter border security, if it causes anguish to some? Are at fault if we think taxes are high enough, though some devoutly believe more spending is needed?

Are we at fault for opposing the draft in time of war?

It is matter of degrees, you say? After all, you shant falsely shout fire in a crowded theater.

That quote from a WWI opinion sent a man to jail, because he argued that the 13th Amendment prohibited endentured servitude — the draft.

Hate speech, dangerous speech or free speech?

The debate must not be foreshortened by the easily offended.

 

The original version of this column was published at Mr. Mitchell’s blog.

Mr. Mitchell publishes the 4TH ST8 Blog at www.4thst8.wordpress.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Itemsfree speech
Opinion
May 8, 2015
N&V Staff

Related Itemsfree speech

More in Opinion

Republicans: Stop Endorsing Democrats

Ken MinsterAugust 16, 2022
Read More

The Threat From Within

Troy La ManaAugust 14, 2022
Read More

The Case Against Ranked-Choice Voting

N&V StaffAugust 14, 2022
Read More

Nye County Central Committee follows suit with Douglas County

Troy La ManaAugust 13, 2022
Read More

Election integrity

Troy La ManaAugust 13, 2022
Read More

Clean Renewable Energy Plan for Nevada

Troy La ManaAugust 12, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Meet Yuri Maltsev
Why does the left hate entry-level jobs?