• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Super Bowl winners will each get $107,000 — and pay no state income tax on it

Super Bowl winners will each get $107,000 — and pay no state income tax on it
N&V Staff
February 5, 2017

Matt Ryan releases a pass during the Atlanta Falcons’ playoff win over the Green Bay Packers on Jan. 22. (Courtesy: Getty Images)

(Steven Kutz, MarketWatch) – Professional athletes have notoriously complicated tax situations because of the “jock tax,” which means that for every game they play in, they have to pay the income-tax rate of the state where the game is played. But players on the Atlanta Falcons and New England Patriots are in luck this year: The Super Bowl is in Houston, and Texas doesn’t collect income tax.

What’s that mean for each player’s bank account? For starters, the NFL will pay every player on the winning team $107,000, while their vanquished opponents will get checks for $53,000. They won’t pay any state income tax on that. By comparison, last year’s Super Bowl was in the Bay Area, and players paid California’s 13.3% state income tax on their Super Bowl paychecks.

The only states that don’t impose a jock tax in the U.S. are Texas, Florida and Washington — along with Washington, D.C. The three states on this list don’t impose personal state income taxes, and Congress prohibits the District of Columbia from imposing their income tax on nonresidents who work in the area, according to David Hryck, a tax lawyer and personal-finance expert who’s a partner at the law firm Reed Smith.

Click here to continue reading

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsgovernmentSports
Government
February 5, 2017
N&V Staff

Related ItemsgovernmentSports

More in Government

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Some Cheerful News on Flat Rate Taxes

N&V StaffOctober 21, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Running On Empty

N&V StaffOctober 6, 2022
Read More

Help a Sheriff Fire a Corrupt Governor?

N&V StaffOctober 4, 2022
Read More

CCSD – MathLITE and Exacerbating the Teacher Shortage

N&V StaffSeptember 29, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Fellner: We Shouldn’t Have to Ask Permission to Work
Dems Black-and-Blueprint Poses Real Danger to Nevada’s Small Biz Community