• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Government

Why the Teachers Union Hates this Teacher with a Passion

Why the Teachers Union Hates this Teacher with a Passion
N&V Staff
January 3, 2016
Rebecca Friedrichs

The Union’s Public Enemy #1: Rebecca Friedrichs

Daily Caller

(Jason Hart | From Watchdog.org) -Why are union bosses bashingCalifornia teacher Rebecca Friedrichs and the other plaintiffsin the Friedrichs vs. California Teachers Association case?

In a word: money. In three words: heaps of money.

Public employee unions nationwide stand to lose tens of millions of dollars if the Supreme Court rules in favor ofFriedrichs and stopsCTA from taking mandatory fees from non-members.

CTA is astate chapterof the National Education Association, Americas largest labor union.NEA took mandatoryfees from 94,080 non-members in 2015; annual fees for full-time teachers were $183.

Even ifmandatoryagency fee payers paid an average of just $100, NEAs Washington, D.C., headquarters took more than $9 million from non-members who had to pay the union so they could teach. State NEA chapterfees aremuchhigher.

BACKGROUND: Labor bosses ask Supreme Court to rule in favor of forced union dues

Ifthe Supreme Court decides teachers canopt out of paying NEA, unionbosseswill have to modify their spending to account for the loss of forced dues and to avoid alienating members.

A win for the Friedrichs plaintiffswouldnt make it harder for workers to organize, join, or negotiate wages and benefits through a union, contrary to union bosses claims. But it would make it harder for NEA executivesto justify their political spending and their own salaries.

READ MORE

[the_ad id=”25740″]

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Government
January 3, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Government

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Some Cheerful News on Flat Rate Taxes

N&V StaffOctober 21, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Running On Empty

N&V StaffOctober 6, 2022
Read More

Help a Sheriff Fire a Corrupt Governor?

N&V StaffOctober 4, 2022
Read More

CCSD – MathLITE and Exacerbating the Teacher Shortage

N&V StaffSeptember 29, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Milestone Crossed: ESA’s take another giant step forward
Agri-Issues on Prez Campaigns’ Back-Burners…for Now