• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

The Fly in the Free-Trade Ointment of Sugar Program Critics

The Fly in the Free-Trade Ointment of Sugar Program Critics
N&V Staff
August 13, 2018

(Chuck Muth) – In a recent column, Hafeez Esmail of Main Management LLC quotes a Heritage Foundation report declaring that “Societies that enact free trade policies create…a wellspring of freedom, opportunity, and prosperity that benefits every citizen,” adding that free trade “offers consumers the most choices and the best opportunities to improve their standard of living.”

Hard to argue with that, however…

Let’s say one of the consumer choices in the market is a guy selling knock-off Rolexes from the trunk of his car.  Would any free-marketer support that “free trade” even though consumers benefit from the lower prices?  Of course not.

And that’s the fly in the ointment of free traders who criticize tariffs and quotas in the U.S. sugar program which are directed at foreign competitors who are artificially deflating the global market price thanks to subsidies provided to them by their governments.

It’s not free trade when a party is using unethical or unlawful trade practices to gain an unfair advantage over competitors who are playing by the rules.

Mr. Esmail further undermines his own argument by telling a whopper and citing ancient history to buttress it.

“By forcing Americans to pay an average of 43.4 cents per pound in 2012 for inefficiently produced beet sugar instead of 26.5 cents per pound for more efficiently produced world sugar,” he quotes from an American Enterprise Institute report, “U.S. sugar policy forced Americans to pay a ‘premium’ of almost 17 cents per pound for the roughly 17 billion pounds of American sugar.”

First, there ain’t no group of farmers on the planet who are more efficient than American farmers.  Period.

Secondly, the figures cited are from SIX YEARS AGO.  Prices are a lot lower now and are just now starting to recover after Mexico broke US trade law in 2013 and dumped mountains of subsidized sugar on the US market – an action that drove Hawaii out of the sugar business altogether.

Thirdly, the cost of a pound of American sugar TODAY is almost exactly the same as it was over 30 years ago when Reagan was president.  To suggest that the rising cost of sweets and treats in the U.S. is due to the cost of American sugar is to take the idea of “fuzzy math” to an entirely new level.

Mr. Esmail is correct in one thing he wrote though; getting closer to free trade “is often a complicated process.”  But not impossible.

Rep. Ted Yoho has long supported a congressional resolution – Zero for Zero – that would zero out the protections afforded our domestic sugar industries in return for foreign competitors zeroing out their unfair government subsidies.  Such fair trade is the precursor to true free trade.

Complicated or not, it’s the right path for Congress to follow.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views.  His views are his own.

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsbusinessGovernment
Business
August 13, 2018
N&V Staff

Related ItemsbusinessGovernment

More in Business

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Sugar Growers Outraged by New Study Showing Big Candy Posting Big Profits

N&V StaffSeptember 26, 2022
Read More

Behold the First Truly Post-Trump Farm Bill – Properly This Time, DC Conservatives

N&V StaffSeptember 19, 2022
Read More

Food security issues, farmers’ pessimism greet the 2023 farm bill

N&V StaffSeptember 16, 2022
Read More

Runaway inflation puts American food security at risk

N&V StaffSeptember 14, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Fiore: Freedom and Vaccines
The Question 3 Deck is Stacked Against Open Competition and Energy Choice