The Nevadans for Fair Recovery Act: A Victory for Plaintiffs or a Gift to Corporations?

Posted By

The Nevadans for Fair Recovery Act is a proposed ballot initiative aimed at capping attorney contingency fees in civil cases in Nevada at 20%, effective January 1, 2027.

This means attorneys representing clients on a contingency basis could collect no more than 20% of any settlement or award.

PROS

Increased Compensation for Plaintiffs: Supporters argue that capping attorney fees ensures plaintiffs retain a larger portion of their settlements or awards, potentially receiving at least 80% of net recoveries.

Consumer Relief: Advocates suggest that reducing legal fees could lower litigation costs, which may, in turn, decrease prices for goods and services, benefiting consumers.

Public Support: A survey indicates that 71% of Nevada voters support the initiative, reflecting a significant public endorsement.

CONS

Access to Legal Representation: Critics contend that a 20% cap could deter attorneys from taking on complex or high-risk cases, especially for clients unable to pay upfront fees, thereby limiting access to justice for certain individuals.

Impact on Contingency Fee System: Opponents warn that the cap might undermine the contingency fee model, which enables individuals without substantial financial resources to pursue legal action, potentially disadvantaging victims of negligence or misconduct.

Corporate Influence Concerns: Some detractors highlight that the initiative is backed by corporations like Uber, suggesting it may serve corporate interests by limiting legal challenges from individuals, particularly in cases involving significant damages.

In summary, while the Nevadans for Fair Recovery Act aims to increase plaintiffs' net recoveries and reduce litigation costs, it faces criticism for potentially restricting access to legal representation and being influenced by corporate interests.