• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Politics

The President And Obamacare Vs. Catholics

The President And Obamacare Vs. Catholics
Chuck Muth
April 12, 2012

(Jim Clark) – The front-page media buzz of late has been the give, take and presidential spin over lawyers’ arguments before the US Supreme Court and questions posed by the justices in connection with judicial review of Obamacare.  On trial is the Constitutionality of that law’s mandate that every American obtain a policy of health insurance that meets government’s standards. 

Because the decision is not expected to be handed down until some time in June, the subject is expected to continue to command media attention, particularly since President Obama is “whistling through the graveyard” by publicly questioning the propriety of the High Court reviewing a law passed by Congress and signed by the President.

All of this is something of a smokescreen emasculating another Constitutional hiccup arising out of the 2,000 page Obamacare law . . . whether the federal government can mandate that faith organizations must engage in acts that are contrary to their historic doctrines.  Recently the US Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued a regulation pursuant to the Obamacare law requiring that enterprises affiliated with faith organizations must furnish or pay for contraception for their female employees.

Most directly impacted by this regulation is the Roman Catholic Church, which sponsors universities, hospitals, public charities and any number of other enterprises that directly relate to or arise from the tenants of the Church’s teachings. 

The resulting hue and cry from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops was so overwhelming that few other voices were heard although the Presbyterians, Lutherans, Episcopalians, Methodists and other religious institutions also sponsor hospitals, universities, charities, homes for the elderly, etc.  Perhaps they are yet to be heard from.

It is pretty clear that the government can prohibit faith institutions from carrying out practices that constitute crimes or torts under common law.  Congregations cannot sacrifice virgins, assault parishioners, smoke peyote or engage in other practices, which the government has a historic duty to prevent. 

In some cases, exceptions to general laws are culled out as evidence that government is not hostile towards religion (for example, Nevada law, which prohibits possession of alcoholic beverages by minors exempts “possession for an established religious purpose”). 

But can the government force parishioners to commit adultery?  To dishonor their father and mother?  To covet their neighbor’s ox? 

If such hypothetical laws sound ridiculous, how logical is it that the government can force the Roman Catholic Church’s institutions to furnish or pay for items of contraception that church doctrine forbids?

Politically, this is smoldering just below the surface.  Diocese of Reno Bishop Randolph Calvo and Diocese of Las Vegas Bishop Joseph Pepe jointly wrote HHS “objecting to a mandate . . . that would force religious organizations to provide coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and other contraceptives.” 

The US Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that this dispute is not about supplying contraception, but about “an unwarranted definition of religion” prohibited by the First Amendment, which provides “Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion.” 

Superimposed on all this is the fact that Catholic voters, who historically trend Democratic, broke Republican by 54 to 44 in the 2010 GOP landslide election, according to Pew Research. 

So will the Catholic bishops mount a court challenge to the Constitutionality of the Obamacare Law?  Will other Judeo-Christian organizations join them?  Will the GOP peel off even more Catholic voters in the 2012 election?

Stay tuned.

(Jim Clark is President of Republican Advocates and a member of the Washoe County & Nevada State GOP Central Committees.  He can be reached at tahoesbjc@aol.com)

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsObamacarePatient Protection ActUS Supreme Court
Politics
April 12, 2012
Chuck Muth

Related ItemsObamacarePatient Protection ActUS Supreme Court

More in Politics

Local and State Leaders Join A’s in Announcing Plan to Bring MLB to Nevada

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

GOP Candidate Announces Challenge to Clark County Commissioner Following Outrage Over Shop Owner Comments

NN&V StaffMay 23, 2023
Read More

How the GOP Lost Jacksonville

NN&V StaffMay 18, 2023
Read More

Judge Allows Defamation Lawsuit Against Nevada GOP Executive Director to Proceed

NN&V StaffMay 6, 2023
Read More

Crete: Why I Decided Not to Run for Clark GOP Chair

NN&V StaffMay 3, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Forest Service Launches Counteroffensive Against Sagebrush Rebellion
Harry Wants You to Keep Paying His Campaign Backers for ‘Green’ Energy