• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

UM Prof Gets “F” for Intellectual Dishonesty in U.S. Trade Policy Debate

UM Prof Gets “F” for Intellectual Dishonesty in U.S. Trade Policy Debate
Chuck Muth
August 7, 2017

(Chuck Muth) – In a column published by the American Enterprise Institute on August 7, University of Michigan Prof. Mark J. Perry criticized “the wasteful ‘rent-seeking’ (lobbying) that takes place on behalf of domestic industries seeking protection from foreign competition via protectionist trade policies.”

Just as the issue is “illegal” immigration, not just immigration, this issue is about “unfair” foreign competition, not just foreign competition.  And by unfair, we’re talking about foreign governments that subsidize various industries which give them an unfair competitive advantage over American producers that do not get similar government hand-outs.

Anyway, to buck up his disingenuous argument, Prof. Perry resurrected Big Candy’s favorite boogey man, the U.S. sugar program…

“The US has a long history of trade protectionism for American sugar producers in the form of tariffs and import restrictions on low-cost foreign-produced sugar that raises US sugar prices to about two times the world price. Currently, the world price of sugar quoted for futures contracts is less than 15 cents per pound compared to the domestic price of more than 25 cents. But when you’re an ongoing enterprise that continually engages in ‘legal plunder’ from the American consumer to the tune of billions of dollars per year you have to devote significant resources to protecting your coveted position of being insulated from competition from more efficient foreign rivals.”

First of all, the world price of sugar can be quite volatile.  It goes up, it comes down.  Sometimes dramatically.  Meanwhile, the cost of American sugar today is pretty much exactly what the cost of American sugar was 30 years ago.  That’s called “stability.”

Secondly, the 15-cent figure does NOT include shipping.  And since foreign sugar doesn’t get free shipping through Amazon Prime, Prof. Perry is not comparing apples to apples as far as the end cost to consumers goes.

Lastly, the difference between foreign and domestic prices isn’t because our foreign rivals are “more efficient.”  It’s actually because they receive government subsidies; subsidies that are necessary, in part, because foreign producers are actually far LESS efficient that American producers.

That means foreign sugar is artificially low, not that American sugar is artificially high.  And that’s the difference between fair trade and free trade.

As Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross declared in a Wall Street Journal op-ed a week ago, “Defending U.S. workers and businesses against this onslaught (of unfair foreign trade practices) should not be mislabeled as protectionism.”

Someone please get that memo to Prof. Perry.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
August 7, 2017
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Featured Article

Federal court rules Miranda rights don’t apply to civil immigration arrests

The Center SquareNovember 28, 2023
Read More

Making Elections Squeaky Clean: Pigpen Project Rooting Out Bad Registrations

Chuck MuthNovember 25, 2023
Read More

How Sad that We Have to Look South for Happy News

Chuck MuthNovember 20, 2023
Read More

Response to Nikki Haley’s Attack on Free Speech…with a Twist

Chuck MuthNovember 16, 2023
Read More

Report: Mountain states among ‘most free’ in North America

The Center SquareNovember 9, 2023
Read More

The 3 Questions You Should Ask Every Candidate You Run Into

Chuck MuthNovember 6, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Commerce Secretary Smacks Down “Free Market” Supporters of Unfair Trade Practices
Tarkanian Announces GOP Challenge to Repeal & Replace Heller