There’s a big election happening in Wisconsin. No, it’s not for president or Congress — it’s for a seat on the state’s Supreme Court.
But don’t let that fool you. This race could have a huge impact on the whole country.
The two candidates are Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel. One leans left. The other leans right.
And depending on who wins, it could shape not only Wisconsin’s laws but possibly even who controls Congress after the next election.
Very important! https://t.co/34HkCsWqJT
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 25, 2025
What’s This Race Really About?
At first glance, a state Supreme Court race might not seem like a big deal.
But here’s the thing: the Wisconsin Supreme Court has the final say on a lot of important issues in that state — including voting rules, redistricting (how political maps are drawn), and laws passed by lawmakers.
That’s why this race has drawn attention from all over the country.
Susan Crawford is the liberal candidate. She used to work for former Democrat Governor Jim Doyle and has been endorsed by Barack Obama.
Critics say she’s too political for a judge. One big concern is that she might push for new political maps that could give Democrats more seats in Congress — even if that’s not what voters want.
Brad Schimel is the conservative in the race. He’s a former attorney general and a judge.
He says he wants to stick to the law and keep politics out of the courtroom. Schimel’s campaign is focused on protecting the Constitution and stopping what he calls a “leftist power grab.”
What’s the Big Deal with the Maps?
Here’s where things get tricky — but don’t worry, we’ll keep it simple.
Every 10 years, states redraw their political maps based on new census numbers.
These maps decide which voters are in which districts. And that can affect which party wins elections.
In Wisconsin, Republicans have had control of the state legislature for over a decade, thanks in part to how the maps were drawn. Democrats say that’s “unfair.”
They want the liberal-majority state Supreme Court to throw out the current maps and draw new ones.
But here’s the catch: the maps were already ruled legal — not just once, but by courts all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Schimel says trying to throw out those maps now would be activist judging — meaning judges pushing their personal beliefs instead of following the law.
That’s a big red flag. When judges make the rules instead of lawmakers, it’s like the referees are picking sides in the game.
That’s not fair.
What Do Voters Think?
Polling in races like this is always a little tricky, but one thing’s clear: people are paying attention.
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, outside groups have already poured millions of dollars into the race. That includes big money from liberal groups who want to flip control of the court.
On the other side, local conservative groups are rallying behind Schimel. They see this race as the last line of defense against judges who want to rewrite the rules in favor of one political party.
What Critics Say
Supporters of Crawford say she’ll bring “balance” to the court and make sure every vote counts.
They argue that the current maps favor Republicans too much and need to be redone to be more “fair.”
But conservatives point out that fairness doesn’t mean favoring one party over the other.
It means sticking to the law and respecting voters’ choices.
Plus, changing the maps now — right before a major election — could throw everything into chaos.
That’s not good for voters, no matter which party you support.
Why This Matters Everywhere
Even if you don’t live in Wisconsin, this race could affect you.
Why?
Because if the court redraws the maps and flips a few Congressional seats, it could help Democrats win back control of the U.S. House.
That’s why this isn’t just about one state.
It’s about how much power judges should have — and whether we’re okay with courts being used to tilt the playing field.
If you believe in limited government, local control, and keeping politics out of the courtroom, this race is one to watch.
In the end, it comes down to a simple choice: Do we want judges who follow the law? Or judges who try to change it?
Wisconsin voters will answer that question soon.
And the rest of us? We’d better pay attention — because what happens there could shape the future for all of us.
This article was written with the assistance of AI. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
