• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Yahoo Stands up to Big Brother, Gets Slapped Down

Yahoo Stands up to Big Brother, Gets Slapped Down
Chuck Muth
September 14, 2014

a(Chuck Muth) – If you’re looking for bipartisanship in Washington, DC, look no further than government measures that trample on what are supposed to be constitutionally-protected privacy rights.

But before we get into this, let me just point out that if you’re one of those people who say, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear,” you’re (a) not going to like this column, and (b) are part of the problem.

On September 11th, of all days, the Wall Street Journal published a story headlined:

“Yahoo Faced Big U.S. Fines Over User Data: Government Wanted to Charge Internet Firm $250,000 a Day Fine If It Didn’t Comply With NSA Request.”

The demands made of Yahoo by the National Security Agency (NSA) reportedly began in November 2007, well before Barack Obama was elected president.  So this is not a partisan issue.  At the time, the Journal reports, the government requested “warrantless surveillance” of certain Yahoo customers.

The operative word, of course, is “warrantless.”

Yahoo objected. It challenged the government’s demands at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).  In a legal brief, Marc Zwillinger, an attorney for Yahoo, wrote:

“The issues at stake in this litigation are the most serious issues that this nation faces today – to what extent must the privacy rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution yield to protect our national security.”

The Journal further reported that:

“In one brief, Yahoo states the main issue of the case is whether the Constitution protects the communications of U.S. citizens or legal residents believed to be outside the U.S.”

A very serious and legitimate concern.

Not surprisingly, but disappointingly, FISC Judge Reggie Walton dismissed Yahoo’s challenge and the Justice Department asked that Yahoo be fined $250,000 PER DAY for every day Yahoo didn’t comply with the government’s demands.  Yahoo eventually was forced to capitulate in May 2008.

After the government’s threat was revealed this week, Yahoo’s general counsel, Ron Bell, issued a written statement:

“We refused to comply with what we viewed as unconstitutional and overbroad surveillance and challenged the U.S. Government’s authority. Our challenge, and a later appeal in the case, did not succeed.”

It’s important to note this problem and controversy pre-dated the Edward Snowden NSA leaks by more than five years.  And it should be further noted, as reported in the Journal story, that both Google and Microsoft have similarly challenged government fishing expeditions without warrants in court.  So this is not just about Yahoo.

Now, I understand that it’s a difficult job balancing national security and individual privacy rights. But since 9/11 the scales have tipped WAY too far in favor of the government – which has the power to bring even giant American technology companies to their knees!

So what chance do individuals such as you or me have?

Since the government continues to conduct these very controversial surveillance programs, it’s important for Congress and the public to know more about what Big Brother is and has been up to, and assure that essential constitutional privacy protections secured by our Founders aren’t further eroded.

To paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither, and will soon lose both.

(Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views.  His opinions are his own.)

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Business
September 14, 2014
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Business

Nohra: GOED vs. State Senator: A Showdown Over Tax Reductions in Nevada

NN&V StaffMay 10, 2023
Read More

Nevada Biz Execs Give Governor “B-” Grade, Want ID Requirement for Voting

NN&V StaffMay 1, 2023
Read More

Say No to SB 394: Why Increasing Property Taxes is a Bad Idea

NN&V StaffApril 13, 2023
Read More

Budweiser Spreading Transgender Poison

NN&V StaffApril 11, 2023
Read More

Senators Push for Permanent Repeal of Death Tax

NN&V StaffApril 11, 2023
Read More

EU Serves as Example of What NOT to Do on Sugar Imports

Chuck MuthDecember 15, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Fiore on Tesla: Business Flourishes when Taxes are Low and Predictable
Tesla Deal is Great…for Tesla