• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Clark: The Failure of Democracy

Clark: The Failure of Democracy
Chuck Muth
November 7, 2015

Jim Clark(Jim Clark) – Winston Churchill once famously said: “Democracy is the worst form of government . . . except all others.” Was he right?

An oft-circulated email purports to quote University of Edinburgh Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler (1747 – 1813) as saying: “A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy which is always followed by a dictatorship.”

Research indicates that he may never have said that (although he was famously cynical about democracy), but it’s hard to quarrel with the thrust of the statement. Bibliographers say that the earliest documented expression of that concept was by American industrialist H. W. Prentis, Jr. who, in a speech to the National Conference Board given in New York in 1943, said: “. . . the release of initiative and enterprise made possible by popular self-government ultimately generates disintegrating forces from within. Again and again after freedom has brought opportunity and some degree of plenty, the competent become selfish, luxury-loving and complacent; the incompetent and the unfortunate grow envious and covetous, and all three groups turn aside from the hard road of freedom to worship the Golden Calf of economic security. The historical cycle seems to be: from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage once more.”

(Note that the last part of the quote can pretty much be said to trace the history of America although we have not yet reverted to being British colonies.)

In a 2012 article titled “Democracies Always Fail,” David Cohen wrote: “The democratic process relies on the assumption that (a majority of) citizens can recognize the best political candidate or best policy when they see it. (But) research . . . at Cornell University shows that incompetent people are inherently unable to judge the competence of other people or the quality of those people’s ideas . . . party allegiance and voting have become primarily emotional processes.”

So is democracy doomed? I didn’t think so until I saw the results of an October 29, 2015 Rasmussen poll. In a survey of 1,000 likely voters with a cross-section of political persuasions, the Rasmussen organization found that 56 per cent of Democrats view Socialism favorably. By comparison the study found that just 12 percent of Republicans have a favorable view of Socialism while 80 percent embrace Capitalism. On a more encouraging note 66 percent of the Democrats polled also viewed Capitalism favorably which infers a conclusion that a majority of Democrats and a minority of Republicans might have been the “incompetent” voters studied by Cornell University.

How could anyone favor both Capitalism, where the factors of production are owned by individuals, and Socialism where they are owned by the government? Are a majority of Democrats “feeling the Bern”? Has Hillary’s tilt to the left influenced “incompetent” voters involved in a “primarily emotional process”?

An August, 2015, an article titled “Democrats: They’re all Socialists now” reported that MSNBC Hardball’s Chris Matthews asked Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz: “What’s the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist?” Shultz began to explain the difference between a Democrat and a Republican but Matthews cut her off and repeated his question. She did not answer. Can this great nation survive or we headed for bondage. We’ll find out in a year.

 

Jim Clark is President of Republican Advocates. He has served on the Washoe County and Nevada GOP Central Committees. He can be reached at tahoesbjc@aol.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
November 7, 2015
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Caldara: The GOP’s Master Plan to Keep Losing

NN&V StaffFebruary 3, 2024
Read More

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2024 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

LVRJ: Heck seeks more physician assistants for VA
Attorney General Laxalt files Motion to Dismiss Second Lawsuit challenging Nevada’s Education Choice Program