How many times have you seen someone say something online and thought, “Yeah, that wasn’t smart”?
Well, one man in Oklahoma just learned the hard way that words on a screen can carry very real consequences.
Logan Murfin, 26, of Skiatook, Okla., was convicted April 24 on 10 felony charges related to X posts he made about “gunning down” ICE personnel.
He is in federal custody pending awaiting sentencing. pic.twitter.com/Mjaor6Mipv
— U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (@ICEgov) May 2, 2026
Logan Christopher Murfin, a 26-year-old from Skiatook, was convicted by a federal jury on April 24, 2026, after posting violent threats against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on X.
Not just one or two bad posts, either. He’s being hit with ten felony counts.
From Keyboard to Courtroom
According to federal prosecutors, Murfin used the username “Azulenq” in 2025 to post messages calling for ICE agents to be “gunned down,” shot, or executed.
They weren’t vague complaints or political opinions. They were direct threats.
Homeland Security Investigations tracked the posts back to Murfin’s home using search warrants and digital evidence. After his arrest in December 2025, he admitted to making the posts.
His explanation? He told agents he was “pissed off” at ICE. His frustration has now turned into a federal conviction.
Murfin was found guilty on five counts of threatening to assault and murder federal officers and five counts of using interstate communication to issue threats. He’s currently in federal custody, waiting to be sentenced. Each count could bring serious prison time.
When “Just Words” Aren’t Just Words
Threatening to harm law enforcement officers, even online, is treated as a real and serious crime.
It doesn’t matter if you never acted on it. The threat itself crosses the line.
It’s the same reason you don’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater or “bomb” at an airport.
You can claim you didn’t mean it later, but it sounded real when you said it. Same idea here.
A Bigger Problem Than One Case
Federal officials say this case is just one out of a noticeable increase in threats against ICE agents and other federal officers, especially tied to immigration enforcement.
Immigration is one of the most heated issues in the country right now. Emotions run high. People get angry.
But there’s a difference between disagreeing with policy and calling for violence.
Nevadans deal with immigration issues every day. We debate border security, impact on jobs, schools, and public safety.
And like the rest of the country, Nevada has seen its share of heated rhetoric.
Cases like this are a reminder that crossing into threats isn’t just reckless. It’s illegal.
The Other Side of the Argument
Some critics argue that prosecutions like this could chill free speech.
Free speech matters. It’s one of the core rights in this country. But the courts have long held that true threats aren’t protected.
Calling for violence against specific people or groups isn’t political debate. It’s something else entirely.
Actions Have Consequences
A man got angry. He went online. He said things he shouldn’t have said.
And now he’s paying the price.
It’s a reminder we could probably all use. The internet might feel like a place where anything goes – but it’s not.
We all know that once it’s on the internet, it’s there forever. The words you type don’t just disappear.
They follow you all the way to a courtroom.
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.
