• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Candy Makers Cry over Spilled Milk (Chocolate)

Candy Makers Cry over Spilled Milk (Chocolate)
N&V Staff
November 6, 2019

(Chuck Muth) – Daniel Moore of the Pittsburg Post-Gazette wrote an article this week that again attacks the U.S. sugar program of import limits and tariffs on certain foreign sugar.

The article quotes a local candy manufacturer who complained that American sugar “costs roughly twice as much as sugar produced in other countries.”

As usual, such critics gloss over two important points…

1.)  The cost of foreign sugar is only cheaper because foreign nations are directly subsidizing the cost of production and export.  It’s like buying stolen watches.

As Philip Hayes, spokesman for the American Sugar Alliance told Mr. Moore, “The U.S. price of sugar, roughly 27 cents a pound, reflects the true cost of production.”

2.)  The cost of American sugar today is almost exactly what the cost of American sugar was 30 years ago.  So the higher cost for candy bars today isn’t because of the cost of sugar.

Indeed, the fact that sugar-infused products today cost more than yesteryear is due to rising employment costs, higher taxes, the rising cost of government regulatory compliance, rising insurance costs, rising real estate costs, etc.

Not sugar.

Nevertheless, U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) – who represents “a substantial number of confectioners and food companies” – is cosponsoring a bill to gut the U.S. sugar program, claiming it “threatens thousands of well-paying jobs in Pennsylvania.”

I get the politics of this.  Toomey is willing to sacrifice the jobs of sugar farmers who don’t live in his state in order to subsidize, through cheap foreign imports, the manufacturing jobs of his constituents.

But playing parochial politics is no way to determine national trade policy.

And the fact is, as Mr. Moore pointed out in his article, “Farmers in the soybean, corn and dairy business receive heaps of taxpayer-funded subsidies” while American sugar farmers receive ZERO taxpayer-funded subsidies.

When it comes to reforming agricultural policy, it seems Congress should spend its time trying to provide a little relief to American taxpayers rather than trying to provide a bonanza to global sugar competitors who “cheat” in what certainly is NOT an international “free market.”

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views.  His views are his own.

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment
Business
November 6, 2019
N&V Staff

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment

More in Business

Trump, Biden and U.S. Sugar Policy

N&V StaffJanuary 11, 2021
Read More

GUEST COMMENTARY: How the Whiskey Industry Could Point Way for Sugar Sector

N&V StaffDecember 14, 2020
Read More

What Congress Can Learn from Vietnam on Sugar Policy

N&V StaffDecember 8, 2020
Read More

Preserve U.S. Sugar Policy Regardless of Presidential Election Result

N&V StaffNovember 20, 2020
Read More

Two-Cents Worth: The Cost of Protecting American Sugar Farmers

N&V StaffOctober 19, 2020
Read More

Dear Congress: Reject the “Profit Protection for Optometrists” Bill

N&V StaffOctober 4, 2020
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics Muth's Truths business government Government Opinion Obama News Donald Trump GOP Republicans Ron Knecht Adam Laxalt

Copyright © 2020 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Economists fear growth in Nevada is misrepresented
ICYMI: Big Pharma Continues to Profit From Patent Abuse