• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Collection Agencies With Badges, Guns and Robes

Collection Agencies With Badges, Guns and Robes
Chuck Muth
March 26, 2015

(Fred Weinberg) – Just when you thought the discourse in Nevada’s capital, Carson City, could not become more stupid, Nevada Supreme Court Chief Justice James Hardesty told the legislature that the Court will be broke on May 1 because the cops aren’t writing enough tickets.

Apparently, in Nevada, most of our cops have received and understood the message which was being sent to the Feds at the Bundy Ranch last year.  Enough. Those above them in the food chain?  Not so much.

Last week, in this space, I wrote about the criminal justice system morphing into a collection agency.  If this doesn’t prove my theory I’m not sure anything short of a riot by white folks in the suburbs will.

The Nevada Constitution says:  6. Sec: Excessive bail and fines; cruel or unusual punishments; detention of witnesses. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor shall cruel or unusual punishments be inflicted, nor shall witnesses be unreasonably detained.

What, exactly, do you think it is when assessments are put on fines, specifically, to fund the court?

The court is whining because the Nevada Highway Patrol—in a fit of good sense—has changed the way it looks at traffic enforcement.  Instead of sitting on the side of the road with radar guns, the NHP’s strategic plan keeps the emphasis on violations that could cause crashes, including distracted driving and driving under the influence. Also, people seem to be driving better.

Now, here’s the rub.  It used to be easy for these guys to add a new program.  Stick a fee on traffic tickets and it’ll all be paid for.  Drug Court? No problem. Veterans Court? No problem.  We don’t actually have to prioritize our spending and make tough budget decisions, we’ll make the “criminals” pay for it.

Problem is, we don’t have enough criminals and it appears that there is a financial incentive to create and catch more.  Keep it up and you have some of the very same things which caused Ferguson, Missouri.  How long can you gouge people with the long arm of the law before they start fighting back?

And in the case of these “fees” if some taxpayer group could get just one judge to say that they’re really taxes, it would be interesting to go back and see how many of them were passed after the Gibbons Amendment went into effect without the requisite supermajority vote of the legislature or a vote of the people.

The Nevada Resort Association—which spends most of its time saying “we pay too much”—is always talking about a “broad-based” funding mechanism.  That’s code for gouge someone else.

This is one of those areas which we really need to look at that.

The justice system shouldn’t pay for itself with fees attached to fines. It is axiomatic that government will always expand to require all the available money and then ask for more.

So such funding sounds good until you realize that it will, inevitably, create an incentive for more and more violations creating a self-liquidating justice system.

Go back and read that line from the Nevada Constitution.

What part of “nor excessive fines imposed” don’t you understand?  If a reduction in tickets causes a court system to go broke, then, by definition, the fines are excessive and unconstitutional at the state level.

The legislative argument that “everybody does it” should be met with my mother’s favorite rejoinder—“if everybody is going to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge, are you jumping too?”

 

Mr. Weinberg is publisher of the Penny Press. Get to know more about him by visiting www.PennyPresslv.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
March 26, 2015
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More

Nevada News & Views: May 20, 2023

NN&V StaffMay 20, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Testimony on AB182: Collective bargaining reforms will create a better balance of power
Gingrich: We Are Losing to an Enemy We Refuse to Name