Dina Titus Says Obamacare “Works.” If It Works, Why Does It Need Billions in Subsidies?

Posted By


 

Nevada Democrats love to say Obamacare is a success story.

This week, Rep. Dina Titus went on C-SPAN and said the Affordable Care Act is “working,” even though it needs billions in taxpayer subsidies to keep premiums affordable.

She argued the subsidies are needed because families are struggling with the cost of living and said Republicans have no real solutions.

For Nevada families who actually use the system, that’s not quite telling the full story.

If It Worked, It Wouldn’t Need Permanent Subsidies

Titus says the subsidies are just a tax credit added during COVID to help people who were unemployed. That’s technically true, but it leaves out the bigger picture.

Those “temporary” subsidies were supposed to expire. Instead, Democrats have extended them again and again. Now they are treated like a permanent entitlement.

A health care system that only works when Washington keeps pouring in more money is not working. It’s being propped up.

If the ACA were affordable on its own, families wouldn’t need taxpayer help every single year just to pay their premiums.

Subsidies Don’t Fix the Real Problem

Titus is right about one thing. Nevada families are dealing with an affordability crisis.

Groceries cost more. Gas costs more. Power bills are up. Housing costs are out of control in Clark and Washoe counties.

But here’s what she doesn’t say.

Those rising costs didn’t happen by accident. They came after years of heavy federal spending, higher energy costs, and regulations that drive prices up. Now Democrats want to use subsidies to cover up the damage.

Subsidies don’t lower health care costs. They just hide them.

The premiums keep rising. Taxpayers just pay a bigger share.

Insurance Isn’t the Same as Health Care

Titus warns that ending subsidies would “take away health care.” That sounds scary, but it’s misleading.

Subsidies don’t provide care. They reduce the cost of insurance premiums.

Many Nevadans with ACA plans still face high deductibles, narrow provider networks, and long wait times. Having an insurance card doesn’t mean you can afford to see a doctor or get timely treatment.

Coverage on paper is not the same as real access.

Republicans Have Offered Solutions, Even If Democrats Ignore Them

Titus claims Republicans have “offered no solutions.” That’s simply not true.

Republicans have pushed ideas like:

• Health Savings Accounts
• Allowing insurance competition across state lines
• Price transparency so patients know costs upfront
• More flexible plan options
• Expanded association and short-term plans

Democrats may not like these ideas, but pretending they don’t exist is dishonest.

What Democrats rarely offer is a plan to lower actual health care prices without dumping more costs on taxpayers.

Premiums Aren’t Going Down, Taxpayers Are Just Paying More

Titus criticizes Health Savings Accounts by saying they don’t address premiums. But premiums are high partly because consumers are shielded from real prices.

When patients don’t see costs, there’s no incentive to shop, compare, or demand better value. That drives prices up across the system.

The ACA also mandates coverage many people don’t want or need, which pushes premiums higher for everyone.

Lower premiums funded by taxpayers aren’t lower premiums. They’re just paid by someone else.

After 14 Years, “It Needs Fixing” Isn’t Good Enough

Titus admits Obamacare still needs fixing. That’s a big admission after more than a decade in place.

If the law worked as promised, premiums would be affordable without subsidies. Choice would be expanding, not shrinking. And families wouldn’t be stuck with high deductibles and limited networks.

Nevada families deserve honesty, not talking points.

If Obamacare truly worked, Democrats wouldn’t be scrambling every year to extend subsidies to keep it afloat.

That’s not success. That’s dependence.

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.