• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

Look Out for Optometric Wolves in Sheep’s Eyewear!

Look Out for Optometric Wolves in Sheep’s Eyewear!
Chuck Muth
September 28, 2016

a

(By Chuck Muth) – It never ceases to amaze how many professional practitioners of the Dark Art of Political Spin think so much of their own genius – and so little of the rubes living in the heartland – that they honestly believe they can try selling ice to Eskimos and get away with it.

Latest example: The Contact Lens Consumer Health Protection Act of 2016 (HR 6157) – which has absolutely nothing to do with protecting consumer health and 100% to do with protecting the profits of a protected market for optometrists.

Indeed, in complying with the truth-in-labeling laws of this land, a more accurate name for this bill would be “The Optometrist Profit Protection Act of 2016.”

At issue is the fact that optometrists are the only medical professionals who are allowed to not only issue a prescription, but to fill it – at a significant profit.  Specifically, prescriptions for contact lenses.

Now…

According to the headline of a press release sent out last week by the American Optometric Association (AOA), HR 6157 “Would Protect the Health and Safety of Contact Lens Consumers from Predatory Online Sales Tactics.”

Interesting.  It appears the intent of the proposed bill is to protect consumers from predatory ONLINE sales tactics while doing nothing to protect consumers from predatory IN OFFICE sales tactics at the ol’ eye doctor.

This reminds me of that scene in the movie Animal House where the character named Otter exclaims, “He can’t do that to our pledges.  Only WE can do that to our pledges!”

The first paragraph of the release claims the proposed legislation “would ensure that online sellers of contact lenses are held accountable for deceptive, abusive and illegal sales tactics that threaten patient health.”

OK, I’m no rocket surgeon, however…

Doesn’t the very phrase “illegal sales tactics” mean that whatever those sales tactics are, they’re already, um, illegal?  And if they’re already illegal then, um, why do we need a new bill rather than enforce the existing laws?

We also already have laws against deceptive advertising – except, of course, when it comes to deceptive headlines and sales pitches by a PR firm in a press release peddling certain special interest legislation.

The bottom line is that many contact lens consumers have found ordering their contact lenses online from reputable firms such as Lens.com or from outside retailers such as Costco to be more convenient and/or less costly than buying directly from their optometrist.

As such, optometrists – who heretofore had a virtual monopoly over sales of contact lenses – are seeing their bottom lines shrinking.  And these profit-hungry wolves are none too happy seeing their meal tickets movin’ on down the e-road.

So they’re doing what any other good “rent seeker” would do: Ask the government to help them out by screwing the competition with a new law.

Of course, it would be bush-league to actually cop to the true motivation behind the bill.  So the AOA is peddling the measure as “for the patient” – an only slightly less offensive snow job than saying it’s “for the children.”

Now here’s what Congress should do instead…

Rather than trying to strangle the competition through Big Brotherish strong-arm legislative tactics, Congress ought to deregulate the contact lens industry in the U.S. altogether.

That’s right.  The fact is no prescription is necessary to purchase contacts in a number of other industrialized countries.  So prescription requirements in the U.S. are in place for the sole purpose of protecting and enriching optometrists.

And when your optometrist argues that you “need” a prescription for your own safety, ask why a prescription is needed to buy contact lenses to protect your health, but not to buy a pack of cigarettes!

Then sit back and watch their head explode trying to explain THAT one.

Some Members of Congress can huff and puff all they want.  But HR 6157 should be blown away at the earliest opportunity.  So let it be written; so let it be done.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
September 28, 2016
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Featured Article

Democrats to Poor, Dark-Skinned Kids: Drop Dead!

Chuck MuthJune 5, 2023
Read More

Disgraceful: All but 3 Republicans Go Wobbly on Christmas Tree Bill!

Chuck MuthJune 4, 2023
Read More

Poster Child for Insanity: The 2023 Nevada Legislature

Chuck MuthJune 4, 2023
Read More

Guv Kills Bills: Joe Don Veto Slays Democrat Duds

Chuck MuthJune 2, 2023
Read More

Flooding causes state of emergency in northern Nevada

The Center SquareJune 2, 2023
Read More

Muth’s Truths PLUS+ Special End-of-Session Edition

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

8 Things You should Know about the Las Vegas Dome Stadium Proposal
Zero-for-Zero Beats False Info and Skewed Analysis Every Day Ending in “Y”