• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

Maybe It’s Time to Try Something New to Reform the U.S. Sugar Program?

Maybe It’s Time to Try Something New to Reform the U.S. Sugar Program?
N&V Staff
October 10, 2016

a

(Chuck Muth, President, Citizen Outreach) – In a recent Weekly Standard op-ed titled “The Democrats’ Sweet Tooth,” Kevin Cochrane dishes out some of the same left-over propaganda arguments about the U.S. sugar program that have easily, though not widely, been discredited by reality.  Here’s a dollop of the counter-arguments…

1.)  Unlike many of our foreign competitors, there are no cash subsidies paid to American sugar farmers.  None. Zero.  Zilch.

2.)  The cost of U.S. sugar today is almost exactly what the cost of sugar was back during the Reagan presidency some 30 years ago.  If American consumers today are paying “higher prices for everything from bakery goods to candy bars,” it’s not because sugar costs more, but labor, government regulation, taxes and profit-taking.

3.)  Along that same line, if U.S. candy makers “have left the United States…taking tens of thousands of jobs with them,” it’s not because of the cost of sugar but, again, because of the higher cost of labor, government regulations, taxes and profit-taking.

4.)  The reason there is a U.S. sugar program still in place today isn’t to keep U.S. sugar prices artificially high, but to protect U.S. sugar farmers from foreign competitors whose governments unfairly and often unlawfully directly subsidize these less-efficient farmers to undercut American farmers by keeping their prices artificially low.

Mr. Cochrane also noted that efforts to phase out the sugar program in the 1996 farm bill weren’t successful.  Nor have subsequent efforts since.  That’s primarily because Congress keeps trying to do the same thing year after year.

Maybe it’s time to try something else?  Maybe it’s time make better trade deals that are a win-win for all parties instead of a win for foreign competitors and a loss for America’s farmers?

Maybe it’s time for Congress to take a serious look at Rep. Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” proposal in which “the President, by agreements negotiated under the auspices of the World Trade Organization, should seek elimination of all direct and indirect subsidies benefitting the production or export of sugar by” other nations?

Maybe it’s time to negotiate trade agreements in which we eliminate our sugar program in return for them eliminating theirs so that the global sugar market isn’t only free of artificial distortion, but – and pardon the phrase – fair and balanced?

Maybe it’s time for Congress to stop doing the same thing and expect a different result?

Maybe.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
October 10, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Featured Article

Buyers need 40% more income to purchase homes in top metro areas, report finds

The Center SquareMay 16, 2022
Read More

Falling water level reveals human remains at Lake Mead twice in one week

The Center SquareMay 11, 2022
Read More

So You Want to Know Where the Route 91 Harvest Festival Money Is?

N&V StaffMay 10, 2022
Read More

Democratic governor’s group pledges $75 million to reelect seven governors

The Center SquareMay 9, 2022
Read More

Lake Powell operators to withhold water to protect hydroelectric power

The Center SquareMay 5, 2022
Read More

More on the Nevada GOP’s Fouled-Up Pre-Primary Endorsement Process

N&V StaffMay 3, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Obama Muth’s Truths Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Trump Talk (Warning: Adult Content Ahead)
Trump Talk (Warning, Adult Content Ahead)