• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Nevada PERS Reform

Nevada PERS Reform
Chuck Muth
March 12, 2015

Jim Clark(Jim Clark) – Gov. Sandoval’s State of the State speech was jam packed with ideas for his reform agenda.  His area of emphasis was to fix public education, a change-resistant colossus which prior legislatures have unsuccessfully tried to fix by throwing taxpayer money at it.  Other reforms high on his list included curbs on public employee collective bargaining and squeezing the waste out of public building costs by requiring competitive (union and non-union) bidding.  But he only made a brief mention of fixing Nevada’s Public Employee Retirement System (PERS).

What needs fixing?  By one estimate, PERS is legally committed to pay defined benefit pension liabilities of about $41 billion dollars more than it has or will have in the future.  $41 billion?  Take Gov. Sandoval’s proposed $7.3 billion biannual budget and imagine that from 2016 forward Nevada had only income and no expenses.  It would take over ten years of revenue to fix that $41 billion dollar deficit.  But running Nevada for ten years with zero expenses is not going to happen; so where will the money come from to cover the shortfall?

It will come from the State of Nevada, all 17 counties and school districts, all police and fire departments in Nevada, all cities, towns and general improvement districts in Nevada (except IVGID . . . more on that later) . . .  in short any governmental instrumentality which employs people.  All of these entities contribute to PERS based on salaries paid to their staffs.  In most cases, public employees pay 5.75% of their salaries into PERS and their employer pays the rest.  How much is the “rest”?  20% percent for regular employees and just under 40% for police and firefighters.  And when these chickens come home to roost where will all these government employers get the money?  We taxpayers of course.

How did the shortfall come about?  The PERS board is required by Nevada law to consist of 7 members all of whom must be state of municipal employees with at least 10 years tenure so it’s like the fox guarding the chicken coop.  Add to that the sweetheart deals that public employee unions make regarding overtime pay, longevity pay, etc. that bump retirement benefits and the relatively short qualifying period (20 years if they purchase 5 years of “air” time) the mathematical result becomes a certainty.  Faced with that reality the PERS board kicks the can down the road by assuming an unrealistic annual return on fund investments so everything looks hunky dory.

Although Gov. Sandoval gave short shrift to PERS reform Incline/Crystal Bay’s Assemblyman, Randy Kirner (R – Reno), a former Public Employees’ Benefits Board Chair, has tried to fix this problem since he was first elected only to have his proposed bills killed by Democratic committee chairs.  Now that the GOP controls both the Nevada Senate and Assembly he finally saw his chance.

His first proposal was Assembly Bill 3, a modest proposal that would add two public members to the PERS board who could not be beneficiaries and who must have knowledge or experience in the management and design of retirement plans.  What happened?  Due to vociferous public employee union opposition the measure lost in a vote in the Government Affairs Committee.  Kirner is not giving up.  His AB 190 would create a PERS pensions into a defined contribution plan for employees hired after July 1, 2016 which will make the plan sustainable.

I said above that IVGID employees are not in the PERS system.  When IVGID was first formed it signed an agreement with Social Security.  Our GID also provided employees with a sort of 401k plan which is individual to each staffer.  A few years ago IVGID was investigating PERS and was told by Social Security that it could not exit the program.  Hallelujah. Whatever happens with pension reform local taxpayers will not have to bail out IVGID.  However we could still be on the hook for Washoe County, the school district, etc.

Epilog:  Randy Kirner is fighting on a lonely battlefield.  We need to support him.

 

Jim Clark is President of Republican Advocates.  He has served on the Washoe County and Nevada GOP Central Committees.  He can be reached at tahoesbjc@aol.com.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
March 12, 2015
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Governors ask Biden for ‘honest, accurate’ information on illegal immigration

The Center SquareOctober 4, 2023
Read More

Amodei Statement on Debt Ceiling Bill

Chuck MuthJune 1, 2023
Read More

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

“Ungrateful Miscreants”: Miller, Segerblom Insult Local Small Business Owners

NN&V StaffMay 24, 2023
Read More

Quarter-Million Dollar Ad Campaign Targets Nevada Legislators for Trapping Hispanic Families in Unsafe Schools

NN&V StaffMay 22, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Gingrich: It Isn’t the E-Mails, It’s the Corruption; Congress Has to Find All the Facts
At the capital: More details on the excellent labor reforms in AB182