• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Opinion

Publisher Advocates Blackmail In Pursuit of Bigger Government

Publisher Advocates Blackmail In Pursuit of Bigger Government
Chuck Muth
April 11, 2011

(Mike Chamberlain/The Cranky Hermit) – Las Vegas Sun publisher Brian Greenspun advocates blackmail for solving the stalemate that nearly led to the “shutdown” of the federal government. Greenspun’s weekly Where I Stand column was written before the deal that averted the federal government shutdown but not published until today.

With one exception, perhaps, of essential military travel, there is no reason why we have to keep the planes in the air if saving taxpayer money hangs in the balance. Simply put, air travel is not essential.

So, what the president should do is give some needed time off to the air traffic controllers. Let them sit at home just like the workers at the Commerce Department, the Health and Human Services Department and so on. Although all of these services may be essential in my eyes, I understand that others may disagree. That’s America. But we still don’t need air travel.

Sending the air traffic controllers home will shut down the airports. When that happens, we can have a real, engaged discussion about whether we want government to have a role in our lives and what that role should be. In short, are air traffic controllers essential to our lives? When we reach that decision, we can then ponder the larger question: How much support do we give to an ideological minority in Congress that dreams nightly of a government shutdown?

Regarding Greenspun’s specific example, one could argue that air travel is not “essential”. One could make an equal argument that it is not “essential” that air traffic control be performed by the government.

There are other countries, Canada for instance, that have privatized the air traffic control system. The example Greenspun uses is a case in which the federal government has usurped a power that could just as easily, and undoubtedly more efficiently, be done by private entities, then points to the importance of that activity to justify the importance of government. It is a circular logic that is frequently used by big government proponents to expand the scope and power of government while also making the people more reliant upon government.

But Greenspun’s proposal has even wider, more sinister implications. Rather than convincing us of the necessity of the federal government and the importance of avoiding shutdowns, Greenspun has demonstrated why so many of us believe that government intrusions into our lives must be scaled back. The potential for the type of blackmail in pursuit of political goals that he proposes should frighten every freedom-loving American.

Should we allow the government to control our movements by supporting large-scale public transportation projects if politicians, government unions and other political actors could disrupt our lives in the future by threatening shutdowns in order to achieve political goals? After all, if air travel is not “essential” then neither is ground travel.

Should we turn more control of our health care system over to the government if these same groups could use threats of withholding care they deem not “essential” in order to advance their political ends?

The more we allow government to intrude into and control our lives, even in well-meaning ways, the greater the chance we will be used as pawns in political battles. The consequences of government shutdowns are not evidence of the importance of government in our lives but of the necessity of reining in the scope and power of the government.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Opinion
April 11, 2011
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Opinion

Tark: Trans “Rights” … and Wrongs

Chuck MuthMay 26, 2023
Read More

Stone: The Truth About AB 250: Will Patients Really Benefit?

NN&V StaffMay 26, 2023
Read More

How the GOP Lost Jacksonville

NN&V StaffMay 18, 2023
Read More

The Dark Side of Wealth Taxes: Why Nevada Should Say No

NN&V StaffMay 12, 2023
Read More

Nohra: GOED vs. State Senator: A Showdown Over Tax Reductions in Nevada

NN&V StaffMay 10, 2023
Read More

Washoe Commissioner Throttles Citizen Speech

NN&V StaffMay 2, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Muth’s Truths Opinion Government Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Tea Party Brokers Budget While Obama Retreats
Let’s Take More Time and Money Away From Learning