Special Session a Dangerous Slippery Slope Toward Annual Sessions

Posted By


 

Nevada lawmakers are back in Carson City for another special session, but the biggest fight may not be over the bills. It may be over the Constitution.

The governor says Nevada faces an “extraordinary occasion.”

But a lot of Nevadans are looking at the list of topics and asking a fair question: Extraordinary for who?

Nevada’s Constitution is crystal clear.

Special sessions are for true emergencies. Not for cleanup work. Not for do-overs. Not because the Legislature ran out of time back in June.

Does This Special Session Meet the Constitutional Bar?

The proclamation pulls in a long list of unfinished bills from the 2023 and 2025 sessions.

Some issues are important. Public safety reforms. Healthcare shortages. Cybersecurity concerns. Those are serious topics that deserve action.

But the constitutional test is not “important.” The test is “extraordinary.” And that is where this session starts to wobble.

The special session will revisit six bills.

Some deal with crime and healthcare access. But others land in the “how is this an emergency?” category. A few stand out.

Example 1: Brewpub Sales and Liquor License Rules

Assembly Bill 404 revises laws around the sale and regulation of alcoholic beverages. Important? Sure. But treating craft beer paperwork like a five-alarm fire is a stretch.

If updating brewpub rules counts as an “extraordinary occasion,” Nevada might as well install bunk beds in the legislative building because we’ll never leave.

Example 2: Assembly Bill 600, covering legislative property and how statutes are organized

This one clarifies which pot of money gets certain proceeds and how the Nevada Revised Statutes are arranged.

That may matter to lawyers and librarians, but nobody mistook this for an emergency when the regular session was running. It is routine housekeeping, not a constitutional crisis.

Example 3: Assembly Bill 238, the film infrastructure and tax credit package

This is the return of Nevada’s most controversial proposal, dressed up as a jobs program.

The proclamation says it is needed “now.”

But even members of both parties pointed out during the regular session that the fiscal analysis shows Nevada only gets about twenty cents back on every tax-credit dollar.

That makes it a bad investment. It still does not make it an emergency.

When routine regulatory fixes and tax-credit negotiations qualify as “extraordinary,” the word loses its meaning.

Even Lawmakers Are Saying It Doesn’t Fit

Republican Assemblywoman Jill Dickman recently told a Nevada Policy audience that unfinished business from earlier sessions “is not an extraordinary occasion,” especially at one hundred thousand dollars a day.

Democratic Assemblywoman Selena La Rue Hatch told the RGJ she shares that concern. If a bill struggled to get votes in June, she said, that does not suddenly make it an emergency.

Conservatives have long argued that the Constitution set a high bar for special sessions to stop Nevada from drifting toward a year-round Legislature.

This proclamation pushes that boundary hard.

Important Issues Still Don’t Make This a Crisis

Nevada does face real challenges. We need stronger public safety laws. We do need more healthcare providers. Cybersecurity has become a real threat.

But none of that appeared out of thin air this month.

These are long-term policy problems. They existed during the 120-day regular session. The Legislature had plenty of time to tackle them, but like every cycle, the early weeks moved slowly.

Hearings dragged on. Side issues ate up time. Then everything crashed into the final deadline.

Running out of time is a management problem. It is not an “extraordinary occasion.”

A Slippery Slope Toward Year-Round Politics

Once Nevada lowers the standard for calling a special session, every governor will follow that lead.

Any bill that stalls becomes an emergency. Any political priority turns into a crisis. Before long, we’ll be meeting in Carson City every year.

That is not what Nevadans voted for, and it is not how a part-time Legislature is supposed to work.

If Nevada wants fewer special sessions, the answer is simple. Use the regular session more efficiently.

Start sooner. Move faster. Focus on the bills that matter instead of waiting until the final weekend to push hundreds of pages across the finish line.

Nevadans deserve serious policymaking, not constitutional gymnastics.

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. Digital technology was used in the research, writing, and production of this article. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.