• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

U.S. Sugar Policy: De Minimis Protections against de maximus Agricultural Price Manipulation

U.S. Sugar Policy: De Minimis Protections against de maximus Agricultural Price Manipulation
N&V Staff
April 20, 2015

Chuck Muth(Chuck Muth) – While our focus at the “Free Market Sugar” project has been primarily directed at the market-distorting subsidies of sugar by foreign governments, it’s important to realize that similar global market interference exists for a wide variety of other agricultural commodities, as well.

An extensive report – “Agricultural Subsidies in Key Developing Countries” by DTB Associates last November – outlined the extent of price manipulation policies that create anything but a global free market for U.S. farmers.

What should be of particular concern to Congress is that the full extent of market-distorting subsidies are “obscured by the fact that some of the countries are delinquent in reporting their subsidy programs to the WTO (World Trade Organization), and many have used, in the notifications they have submitted, faulty methodologies that underestimate the true level of support.”

Meaning that as bad as the known foreign subsidy programs are, the reality is even worse.

The DTB report notes that the increase in government support programs “has resulted in significant increases in production,” which has resulted in huge surpluses over and above that which can be consumed domestically.  And that, in turn, has led to additional “export subsidies to dump surpluses on world markets.”

While the DTB study focused primarily on longstanding government support programs in India, Brazil, Turkey and Thailand, of growing concern for U.S. policy makers should be the “rapid increase” in agricultural subsidies in China, especially direct cash payment to farmers for wheat, corn and rice.

“China did not declare any trade-distorting domestic subsidies above de minimis level when it joined the World Trade Organization,” DTB notes. However, the report “provides evidence that China’s subsidies for all three commodities covered in the study – corn, wheat and rice – exceed the de minimis level, and therefore violate China’s obligations.”

Similar market-distorting government policies exist in the other four nations studied for a variety of agricultural products, including sugar.

Indeed, the Indian government sets a mandatory price that sugar mills must pay to sugar farmers, and some Indian states set their own mandated prices that are even higher than the price set by the national government “regardless of the market price of sugar.”

Current U.S. agricultural policies are neither ideal nor consistent with any reasonable definition of “free market.”  Alas, the global market itself is anything but a government-free free market.  And until that changes, it is not in our nation’s interest to lift de minimis protections for U.S. farmers.

 

Free Market Sugar is a project of Citizen Outreach.  For more information, please visit www.CitizenOutreach.org.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Business
April 20, 2015
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Business

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Sugar Growers Outraged by New Study Showing Big Candy Posting Big Profits

N&V StaffSeptember 26, 2022
Read More

Behold the First Truly Post-Trump Farm Bill – Properly This Time, DC Conservatives

N&V StaffSeptember 19, 2022
Read More

Food security issues, farmers’ pessimism greet the 2023 farm bill

N&V StaffSeptember 16, 2022
Read More

Runaway inflation puts American food security at risk

N&V StaffSeptember 14, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Attorney General Laxalt pursues Fraudulent Health Care Providers
Taxi Cartel’s Uber-Propaganda Campaign wins…for Now