• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Yoho’s Zero-for-Zero Proposal Should also be Applied to Drug Importation

Yoho’s Zero-for-Zero Proposal Should also be Applied to Drug Importation
N&V Staff
March 23, 2017

(Chuck Muth) – An op-ed defending U.S. sugar policy by the American Sugar Alliance (ASA) this week published by KTIC Radio out of Nebraska will be dismissed by some as self-serving.  However, just because the organization is defending its industry doesn’t automatically make their positions and arguments wrong.

In fact, their arguments also can be applied to the ongoing issue of prescription drug importation.

ASA provided observations on a Farm Bill Summit organized by Agri-Pulse and held at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.  Some points for consideration…

  • The U.S. sugar program is administered at no cost to taxpayers
  • The program’s quota and tariff provisions protect U.S. farmers from “less efficient, highly subsidized” foreign competitors
  • Artificially cheap foreign sugar contributed to the closure of the last Hawaiian sugar mill in December
  • Government “regulatory hurdles” continue to hamper both sugar cane and sugar beet U.S. producers

These are all legitimate concerns Congress should bear in mind as the new Farm Bill is crafted.

And in reality, the protections provided by the current U.S. sugar policy are similar to protections afforded U.S. pharmaceutical manufactures.

Interestingly, many free-market conservatives who oppose the sugar program nevertheless continue to support import restrictions on prescription drugs, arguing that foreign subsidies and government price controls distort the market.

It’s the same argument supporters of the U.S. sugar program have been making for years.  It’s simply not a free market when the other side “cheats.”

If it’s wrong to allow the importation of prescription drugs because foreign drugs artificially and unfairly undercut U.S. producers, then it’s wrong to allow the importation of foreign sugar that artificially and unfairly undercuts U.S. producers.  Sauce for the goose and all that.

Opponents of drug importation dismiss arguments that it would foster competition and lower prices, pointing out that the best way to lower prices would simply be to get foreign governments out of the market.

That is the heart-and-soul of Rep. Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” proposal to end the U.S. program in return for foreign countries ending their market-distorting subsidies.  It sounds like Congressman Yoho’s common-sense remedy should be applied to the pharmaceutical market, as well.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views

Prev postNext post

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment
Business
March 23, 2017
N&V Staff

Related ItemsbusinessFeatured ArticleGovernment

More in Business

Zero for Zero the Solution to Global Sugar Subsidies

N&V StaffApril 26, 2022
Read More

Sugar Shortages and Shopping Cart Fights

N&V StaffMarch 28, 2022
Read More

Making a Sugar Mountain Out of a Sugar Molehill

N&V StaffMarch 23, 2022
Read More

U.S. Sugar Policy Stands as Model Against Economic Surrender

N&V StaffMarch 16, 2022
Read More

Sugar Lesson from Ukraine: Food Security is National Security

N&V StaffMarch 11, 2022
Read More

Another Sugar Policy Critic Swings and Misses

N&V StaffFebruary 21, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Obama Muth’s Truths Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2021 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Tolles Brings War on Tele-Medicine to Nevada Legislature
Las Vegas Trash Fight Heats Up on Campaign Trail