• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Contact
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Business

Zero-for-Zero a Sweet Valentine’s Day Gift for Free (and Fair) Marketers

Zero-for-Zero a Sweet Valentine’s Day Gift for Free (and Fair) Marketers
N&V Staff
February 14, 2018

(Chuck Muth) – It’s Valentine’s Day.  And you know what means: Big Candy is out in force with PR press releases, op-eds and blog posts attacking the U.S. Sugar Program, including a guest column by Peter Hess, CEO of Corso’s Cookies, which was published on Tuesday at Syracuse.com…

“For decades, food manufacturers and retailers of all kinds have had to pay inflated prices for a major commodity because of an obscure and controversial government handout to sugar growers. This scheme is known as the U.S. Sugar Program – and it’s made Valentine’s Day celebrations across the country a little more expensive since the Great Depression.”

Critics of the U.S. Sugar Program, such as Mr. Hess, are constantly complaining about the allegedly “high price” of domestic sugar as compared to the global price without…

(a)  Noting that the current price of a pound of American sugar is pretty much the same as it was before Ronald Reagan was president

(b)  Admitting that there are no government “handouts” to American sugar farmers, who receive ZERO dollars in government subsidies

(c)  Acknowledging that the global price is artificially low thanks to actual government subsidies given to foreign competitors

(d)  Taking into consideration the additional cost of shipping, since Amazon Prime doesn’t deliver container ships of sugar to U.S. ports for free (yet)

Also, critics fail to acknowledge that the cost of sugar in sweets is miniscule.  As the American Sugar Alliance pointed out this week, sugar farmers in the U.S. get a mere 2 CENTS out of a $7.99 box of Valentine’s Day chocolates.

“Sugar’s share of sweetened products is very low,” explained Ardis Hammock, a sugarcane farmer from Moore Haven, Florida. “If there’s 2 cents worth of sugar in an $8 box of chocolate, it wouldn’t make a difference even if we gave them the sugar for free.”

Mr. Hess went on to voice support for legislation introduced in Congress that would gut the U.S. Sugar Program, which he claims would make the “whole system a little more competitive and fair.”  But it wouldn’t.  Not unless foreign competitors are required to eliminate their actual subsidy programs to assure a true global free market.

To give you an idea of just what we’re talking about here as it relates to foreign competitors, FinancialExpress.com this week published a report on the sugar industry in India – the world’s #2 sugar producer (Brazil is #1).

The very first paragraph notes that India has already doubled its import taxes – “to check cheaper imports from Pakistan” – and its food ministry is planning to abolish it’s 20% tax on sugar exports to reduce its sugar glut while simultaneously flooding the global market with artificially cheap sugar.

Such government manipulations do not a free market make.

The common-sense solution to making the “whole system a little more competitive and fair” would be to adopt Congressman Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” resolution which provides for the elimination of the U.S. Sugar Program, but only in conjunction with foreign competitors eliminating their domestic sugar subsidy programs.

So let it be written; so let it be done.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Business
February 14, 2018
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Business

Graves: Don’t Allow Subsidized, Foreign Sugarcane to Enter U.S. Markets

N&V StaffNovember 1, 2022
Read More

Conservatives Should Not Surrender on Sugar

N&V StaffOctober 7, 2022
Read More

Sugar Growers Outraged by New Study Showing Big Candy Posting Big Profits

N&V StaffSeptember 26, 2022
Read More

Behold the First Truly Post-Trump Farm Bill – Properly This Time, DC Conservatives

N&V StaffSeptember 19, 2022
Read More

Food security issues, farmers’ pessimism greet the 2023 farm bill

N&V StaffSeptember 16, 2022
Read More

Runaway inflation puts American food security at risk

N&V StaffSeptember 14, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Opinion Government Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

The All-Time Greatest Dodgers
Why Would a GOP Legislator Use Leftwing Talking Points to Attack GOP SoS?