• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

Zero-for-Zero a Sweet Valentine’s Day Gift for Free (and Fair) Marketers

Zero-for-Zero a Sweet Valentine’s Day Gift for Free (and Fair) Marketers
Chuck Muth
February 14, 2018

(Chuck Muth) – It’s Valentine’s Day.  And you know what means: Big Candy is out in force with PR press releases, op-eds and blog posts attacking the U.S. Sugar Program, including a guest column by Peter Hess, CEO of Corso’s Cookies, which was published on Tuesday at Syracuse.com…

“For decades, food manufacturers and retailers of all kinds have had to pay inflated prices for a major commodity because of an obscure and controversial government handout to sugar growers. This scheme is known as the U.S. Sugar Program – and it’s made Valentine’s Day celebrations across the country a little more expensive since the Great Depression.”

Critics of the U.S. Sugar Program, such as Mr. Hess, are constantly complaining about the allegedly “high price” of domestic sugar as compared to the global price without…

(a)  Noting that the current price of a pound of American sugar is pretty much the same as it was before Ronald Reagan was president

(b)  Admitting that there are no government “handouts” to American sugar farmers, who receive ZERO dollars in government subsidies

(c)  Acknowledging that the global price is artificially low thanks to actual government subsidies given to foreign competitors

(d)  Taking into consideration the additional cost of shipping, since Amazon Prime doesn’t deliver container ships of sugar to U.S. ports for free (yet)

Also, critics fail to acknowledge that the cost of sugar in sweets is miniscule.  As the American Sugar Alliance pointed out this week, sugar farmers in the U.S. get a mere 2 CENTS out of a $7.99 box of Valentine’s Day chocolates.

“Sugar’s share of sweetened products is very low,” explained Ardis Hammock, a sugarcane farmer from Moore Haven, Florida. “If there’s 2 cents worth of sugar in an $8 box of chocolate, it wouldn’t make a difference even if we gave them the sugar for free.”

Mr. Hess went on to voice support for legislation introduced in Congress that would gut the U.S. Sugar Program, which he claims would make the “whole system a little more competitive and fair.”  But it wouldn’t.  Not unless foreign competitors are required to eliminate their actual subsidy programs to assure a true global free market.

To give you an idea of just what we’re talking about here as it relates to foreign competitors, FinancialExpress.com this week published a report on the sugar industry in India – the world’s #2 sugar producer (Brazil is #1).

The very first paragraph notes that India has already doubled its import taxes – “to check cheaper imports from Pakistan” – and its food ministry is planning to abolish it’s 20% tax on sugar exports to reduce its sugar glut while simultaneously flooding the global market with artificially cheap sugar.

Such government manipulations do not a free market make.

The common-sense solution to making the “whole system a little more competitive and fair” would be to adopt Congressman Ted Yoho’s “Zero for Zero” resolution which provides for the elimination of the U.S. Sugar Program, but only in conjunction with foreign competitors eliminating their domestic sugar subsidy programs.

So let it be written; so let it be done.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
February 14, 2018
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Featured Article

Federal court rules Miranda rights don’t apply to civil immigration arrests

The Center SquareNovember 28, 2023
Read More

Making Elections Squeaky Clean: Pigpen Project Rooting Out Bad Registrations

Chuck MuthNovember 25, 2023
Read More

How Sad that We Have to Look South for Happy News

Chuck MuthNovember 20, 2023
Read More

Response to Nikki Haley’s Attack on Free Speech…with a Twist

Chuck MuthNovember 16, 2023
Read More

Report: Mountain states among ‘most free’ in North America

The Center SquareNovember 9, 2023
Read More

The 3 Questions You Should Ask Every Candidate You Run Into

Chuck MuthNovember 6, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Ending DC’s Titanically Stupid Fake ‘Free Trade’ Is The Far More Important Policy Change
Why Would a GOP Legislator Use Leftwing Talking Points to Attack GOP SoS?