Nevada Motorcyclists Make the Case for Lane Filtering

Posted By


 

Picture this: You’re on your motorcycle, stopped at a red light on a hot Las Vegas afternoon. The asphalt is radiating heat. Car exhaust fills the air around you. And somewhere behind you, a driver is scrolling through their phone, barely watching the road.

That’s not just uncomfortable. That’s dangerous. And right now, Nevada law says you just have to sit there and take it.

That may soon change. Motorcycle advocates went before a state legislative committee this week asking lawmakers to legalize lane filtering — and the case they made was hard to argue with.

What Is Lane Filtering?

Lane filtering is when a motorcycle moves slowly between stopped or near-stopped cars, usually to reach the front of the line at a red light. It is not the same as lane splitting, which involves weaving between fast-moving traffic at high speeds. Advocates are clear about that distinction.

“Motorcycles aren’t like passenger vehicles,” testified rider Brandon Venturo.

“There’s no bumpers, crush zones or airbags. There’s nothing separating the rider from the impact. And when traffic stops abruptly, it can leave the rider in a very exposed condition.”

That’s the reality. When a car gets tapped from behind, the driver feels a jolt and calls their insurance. When a motorcycle gets hit from behind, the rider can end up dead.

A Real Tragedy, Right Here at Home

This isn’t theoretical. In early April, a Southern Nevada motorcyclist named Josh Barber was killed when a Jeep rear-ended him in stopped traffic. He was 48 years old and a father of five. The Jeep driver was arrested for impaired driving.

David Sampson, a friend of Barber’s, told lawmakers:

“Lane filtering would have saved Josh’s life.”

It’s a simple and devastating point. If Barber had been able to move to the front of the stopped line, the Jeep would have hit only the car behind him — and Barber would likely have gone home to his kids that night.

The Science Backs It Up

This isn’t just a gut feeling. A 2015 UC Berkeley study of nearly 6,000 crashes found that riders who filtered or split lanes were 43% less likely to be rear-ended, and had lower injury severity when the speed difference between the motorcycle and surrounding traffic was under 15 mph.

Compared to non-lane-splitting riders, those who filtered were about half as likely to suffer a head injury and about a third less likely to sustain a torso injury. Even fatalities were cut by more than half.

Heat is another issue. A motorcycle safety specialist at the College of Southern Nevada testified that sitting in stopped traffic exposes riders to a brutal combination: hot asphalt, car exhaust, and a helmet that traps heat. Lane filtering lets them get through it faster.

Other States Already Do This

Nevada is behind the curve here. California legalized lane filtering in 2016. Utah and Arizona followed in 2019 and 2022. Colorado joined them more recently, along with Montana and Minnesota.

That’s a growing list of states — many of them with conservative legislatures — that have decided personal responsibility and rider safety go hand in hand.

What Critics Say

Not everyone is sold. Some law enforcement officials have raised concerns about driver confusion and the risk of side-swipe accidents when motorcycles move through traffic unexpectedly.

Those are fair questions. But they’re also answerable ones.

A well-written bill with reasonable speed limits — say, no more than 15 mph while filtering — and clear traffic conditions would address most of those concerns. The goal isn’t to give riders a free pass. It’s to give them a fighting chance.

Why This Matters to Conservatives

Here’s the thing. If you believe in limited government and personal freedom, this is an easy call.

The government currently tells adults on motorcycles that they cannot make a common-sense safety decision for themselves. You cannot move out of harm’s way, even when sitting still in traffic puts your life at risk. That is government overreach — plain and simple.

Conservatives believe that free people should be able to make decisions about their own safety without a bureaucrat telling them no. Lane filtering is a personal safety choice that hurts no one else and saves lives. The data says so. Other states say so. And Josh Barber’s family says so.

What You Can Do

Motorcycle Rights for Nevada is pushing lawmakers to sponsor a bill in the upcoming session. If you want to see this happen, reach out to your state legislator and tell them to support lane filtering legislation. Tell them the government has no business keeping riders pinned in traffic waiting to get hit.

Nevada is already behind. It’s time to give it some gas.

The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Nevada News & Views. This article was written with the assistance of AI. Please verify information and consult additional sources as needed.