• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • Dashboard
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Forgot Your Password?
  • Government
  • Home
  • Home 20723
  • Interviews
  • Login
  • Members
  • Meme generator
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Pick a New Password
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Profile
  • Recent comments by me
  • Recent comments on my posts
  • Register
  • Submit post
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • More
    • Opinion
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Featured Article

Anti-Sugar Program Rhetoric Grossly Overhyped and Extraordinarily High

Anti-Sugar Program Rhetoric Grossly Overhyped and Extraordinarily High
Chuck Muth
January 30, 2018

(Chuck Muth) – In a recent guest op-ed published by the Daily Caller, Ross Marchand, Director of Policy for the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, argued against a proposal by Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Fla.) in which the United States would drop certain import restrictions on foreign sugar producers in return for foreign competitors eliminating their government subsidies.

In Congress the proposal is known as “Zero for Zero” (HCR 40).

The interesting thing about this issue is that the intellectual arguments for and against continuing the current U.S. sugar program are occurring almost exclusively on the right.  While conservative Mr. Marchand criticized Zero for Zero in the conservative Daily Caller last week, conservative Seton Motley of Less Government has defended it in the same publication.

“We now have a global farm market where most nations have…protectionist walls,” Mr. Motley wrote back in 2013 when the proposal was initially introduced.  “We should work to tear down the barriers that have been built.  It’s called zero-for-zero.”

The big problem with Mr. Marchand’s arguments in opposition is that they are filled with so much disinformation and over-the-top rhetorical hysteria.

For example, he describes the cost of American sugar as “grossly overpriced” and “extraordinarily high.”  But the reality is – and you could look this up – the cost of a pound of sugar in the U.S. today is almost exactly what it was before Reagan was elected.  Not exactly “grossly overpriced” or “extraordinarily high.”

But Mr. Marchand’s strangest argument against Zero for Zero is that foreign governments for “developing nations like Thailand” are unlikely to abide by World Trade Organization (WTO) requirements so the current protections for U.S. farmers against such unfair competition would remain in place.

Well, um, yeah. That’s the point.

Indeed, Mr. Marchand himself acknowledges that the Thai government continues its “misguided policies” of protectionism even after losing a WTO challenge brought by Brazil last year.  “The military government has a track record of bestowing generous subsidies on to farmers,” he writes, “and will readily do so again regardless of WTO rulings.”

So let’s get this straight:  Mr. Marchand is urging Congress to unilaterally eliminate a U.S. policy that restricts the dumping of government subsidized “cheap” sugar into the U.S. market by global competitors whose “corrupt foreign governments” regularly and willfully break trade agreements.

Foolish and irresponsible.

If Thailand and others won’t zero out their government subsidies, the U.S. shouldn’t zero out its trade restrictions.  Trade should be fair, mutually beneficial and only with partners who abide by the rules.  That’s the American way – and should continue to be so.

Mr. Muth is president of Citizen Outreach and publisher of Nevada News & Views

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Featured Article
January 30, 2018
Chuck Muth

Related Items

More in Featured Article

About Last Night: GOP Prez Debate #2

Chuck MuthSeptember 28, 2023
Read More

California leads 20 states to stop Indiana ban on gender-change drugs for minors

The Center SquareSeptember 28, 2023
Read More

Sen. Rosen: Menendez should resign following bribery charges

The Center SquareSeptember 27, 2023
Read More

What You Can Do to Stop the Looming GOP Civil War

Chuck MuthSeptember 26, 2023
Read More

Viguerie at 90: Still Marching Toward the Sound of the Cannons

Chuck MuthSeptember 25, 2023
Read More

UAW strike against Stellantis, General Motors expands to 38 locations

The Center SquareSeptember 24, 2023
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Muths truth

Copyright © 2023 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Trump Doctrine on Fair Trade Mirrors Existing U.S. Sugar Program
Before Burning Steve Wynn at the Stake, Consider This…