• About Us
  • Activity
  • Advertising
  • Books
  • Business
  • Contact
  • EB5
  • Entertainment
  • feedback
  • Government
  • Home
  • Interviews
  • Members
  • National
  • Nevada
  • Nevada News and Views
  • Newsmax
  • NN&V Ads
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Polls
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe
  • Subscription Confirmation
  • Survey
  • Survey
  • Terms of Service
  • Today’s Top 10
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Travel
  • Welcome!
  • Yop Poll Archive
Nevada News and Views
  • Home
  • Muth’s Truths
  • Politics
  • Government
  • Entertainment
  • More
    • Nevada
    • Opinion
    • Business
    • Travel
    • News
    • Sports
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Pinterest

  • RSS

Nevada

Attorney General Laxalt Files Final Brief to Protect Nevadans in Sage Grouse Case

Attorney General Laxalt Files Final Brief to Protect Nevadans in Sage Grouse Case
N&V Staff
August 4, 2016
PC: Blogs.rgj.com

PC: Blogs.rgj.com

(Monica Moazez, Nevada Attorney General ) Nevada Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt issued the following statement after his latest filing in Nevada’s challenge to the federal sage grouse land-use restrictions:

“Along with a majority of Nevada counties, my Office has been pushing back against the federal government’s overreaching sage grouse land plan for almost a year. As our latest brief again demonstrates, the Bureau of Land Management’s rushed, one-size-fits-all sage grouse plan not only violates multiple federal laws, but also the agency’s own regulations. The BLM blatantly disregarded the many Nevada experts and stakeholders, and failed to consider how its plan would impact Nevadans. This approach to regulation is as dismissive to our State as it is illegal, and I remain dedicated to protecting the interests of Nevada and ensuring that agencies follow the law and take the State’s concerns and interests into account.”

In October 2015, AG Laxalt joined a suit on behalf of the State of Nevada challenging the federal government’s land-use plan. In 16 western states including Nevada, the federal plan proposes the withdrawal of more than 10 million acres of federal land from public use. In Nevada alone, mineral exploration and development is barred on nearly three million acres. Additionally, the plan may result in significant restrictions on livestock grazing, resource development, solar and wind energy, and public access on over sixteen million acres of public land in Nevada.

Prev postNext post

Related Items
Nevada
August 4, 2016
N&V Staff

Related Items

More in Nevada

McMahill Announces Major Police Endorsements

N&V StaffApril 6, 2022
Read More

Rosen, Masto Should Oppose Sohn Nomination to FCC

N&V StaffMarch 23, 2022
Read More

Game On! Chattah Files for Attorney General, Blasts Ford and Black

N&V StaffMarch 17, 2022
Read More

Lexit Nevada President Endorses Nevada Governor Candidate Joey Gilbert

N&V StaffMarch 4, 2022
Read More

Stone: Biden’s SOTU Grade a Solid “F”

N&V StaffMarch 1, 2022
Read More

Tisha Black: The GOP Candidate Democrats Love…and Vice-Versa

N&V StaffFebruary 15, 2022
Read More
Scroll for more
Tap

Subscribe Free By Email

Looking for the best in breaking news and conservative views? Let Chuck do all the work for you! Subscribe to his FREE "Muth's Truths" e-newsletter.

* indicates required
Nevada News and Views
Nevada News & Views is an educational project of Citizen Outreach Foundation, a non-partisan IRS-approved 501(c)(3) organization. It is not associated or affiliated with any political party or group. Nevada News & Views is accessible by the public at no cost. It funds its operations through tax-deductible contributions from donors and supporters and does not accept government money or grants.

TAGS

Featured Article Nevada Politics business Muth's Truths government Government Opinion Muth’s Truths Obama Ron Knecht News Donald Trump GOP Republicans

Copyright © 2022 Citizen Outreach | Maintained by VirtualAlly

Statewide Ballot QUESTION one
Cortez Masto’s ill-fated trip to rural Nevada